Trying
to U.S. President Barack Obama to regain control of a sensitive file
specify his intentions on the Guantanamo camp, and its determination to
break with the practices of the former administration of President
George W. Bush in the fight against terrorism.
But his face competition from a radically different speech by His Former U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney, who spoke at the same time. Cheney returned to the political activity of the defense of the anti-terrorism policy followed by the former president, and is considered one of the most important engineers, originally in a heated debate, and can be exacerbated despite Obama, who would prefer to talk to the Americans about the economic recovery and social reform.
Obama's speech comes, while Democrats make his friends in Congress are in a difficult situation, Boukovhm with their Republican opponents, and their refusal to give him the money required to implement his promise to shut down Guantanamo.
These supports close the camp, but fear the transfer of detainees suspected of involvement in terrorism to jails or the streets of American soil, and want to know exactly what Obama intends to do the 240 detainees before agreeing to grant eighty million dollars.
And increased FBI director, Robert Mueller, of the hassles Obama publicly بتشكيكه in the ability of U.S. prisons, which are subject to strict security measures to provide assurances that the detainees will not be able to conspiracy or flee if transferred to it. Obama seeks to reassure Americans.
Said Robert Gibbs, a spokesman for the American President, "" We agree with Congress on the need to provide a detailed plan (to close the camp) by (granting) the money "." But he declined to appear, saying that it needs several months to develop a detailed plan, and his assurance that the operation was linked to several judicial decisions pending. Gibbs said Obama wants to especially "" re-framing "" controversy and display all the decisions that must be taken before the closure of the prison.
What increases the importance of the matter, said Obama still intends to close the camp in no later than January 22, 2010, which also provides a remote signed his presidential duties, according to Gibbs.
This is not the last dispute raised by decisions taken by Obama, and is expected to be taken on these issues. The text of these decisions relating to keep the special military courts, even after repair, to try hundreds of people suspected of involvement in terrorism, triggering resentment organizations defending freedoms.
Even the left, who stood behind Obama during the campaign, questioned the realistic these promises, his objection to the deployment of dozens of pictures practices committed by U.S. soldiers against detainees in Iraq and Afghanistan.
He also attacked the right Obama. For the Republicans, the occasion was an opportunity that must be seized to attack President unpopular after the imposition of the publication notes two تعودان companies to the Bush era. The information notes include the legal justification for interrogation methods that are considered by means of torture opponents. Republicans have accused Obama to work for the benefit of terrorists.
But his face competition from a radically different speech by His Former U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney, who spoke at the same time. Cheney returned to the political activity of the defense of the anti-terrorism policy followed by the former president, and is considered one of the most important engineers, originally in a heated debate, and can be exacerbated despite Obama, who would prefer to talk to the Americans about the economic recovery and social reform.
Obama's speech comes, while Democrats make his friends in Congress are in a difficult situation, Boukovhm with their Republican opponents, and their refusal to give him the money required to implement his promise to shut down Guantanamo.
These supports close the camp, but fear the transfer of detainees suspected of involvement in terrorism to jails or the streets of American soil, and want to know exactly what Obama intends to do the 240 detainees before agreeing to grant eighty million dollars.
And increased FBI director, Robert Mueller, of the hassles Obama publicly بتشكيكه in the ability of U.S. prisons, which are subject to strict security measures to provide assurances that the detainees will not be able to conspiracy or flee if transferred to it. Obama seeks to reassure Americans.
Said Robert Gibbs, a spokesman for the American President, "" We agree with Congress on the need to provide a detailed plan (to close the camp) by (granting) the money "." But he declined to appear, saying that it needs several months to develop a detailed plan, and his assurance that the operation was linked to several judicial decisions pending. Gibbs said Obama wants to especially "" re-framing "" controversy and display all the decisions that must be taken before the closure of the prison.
What increases the importance of the matter, said Obama still intends to close the camp in no later than January 22, 2010, which also provides a remote signed his presidential duties, according to Gibbs.
This is not the last dispute raised by decisions taken by Obama, and is expected to be taken on these issues. The text of these decisions relating to keep the special military courts, even after repair, to try hundreds of people suspected of involvement in terrorism, triggering resentment organizations defending freedoms.
Even the left, who stood behind Obama during the campaign, questioned the realistic these promises, his objection to the deployment of dozens of pictures practices committed by U.S. soldiers against detainees in Iraq and Afghanistan.
He also attacked the right Obama. For the Republicans, the occasion was an opportunity that must be seized to attack President unpopular after the imposition of the publication notes two تعودان companies to the Bush era. The information notes include the legal justification for interrogation methods that are considered by means of torture opponents. Republicans have accused Obama to work for the benefit of terrorists.
22/5/2009
No comments:
Post a Comment