California Seizes Guns as Owners Lose Right to Keep Arms
Patrick T. Fallon/Bloomberg
California Department of Justice police agents walk towards a house near
Ontario, California on Tuesday, March 5, 2013. The agents, working for
the only state-level program to confiscate illegal firearms from owners,
targeted people who’d once legally purchased firearms and lost the
right after being convicted of violent crimes, committed to mental
institutions or hit with restraining orders.
Special Agent Supervisor John
Marsh who coordinates the operations around California, said: “We’re not
contacting anybody who can legally own a gun. The only people we’re
contacting are people who are prohibited from owning guns.”
Photographer: Patrick T. Fallon/Bloomberg
Weapons and ammunition seized
from the home of Lynette and David Philllips by agents with the
California Department of Justice police in Upland, California.
Photographer: Patrick T. Fallon/Bloomberg
Lynette Phillips, 48, and her
husband, David Phillips, 51, sit in their home in Upland, California on
March 5, 2013. Lynette, a nurse, had to surrender three guns after
spending two days in a mental hospital in December. Photographer:
Patrick T. Fallon/Bloomberg
Weapons with ammunition seized
from the home of Lynette and David Phillips by agents with the
California Department of Justice police in Upland, California.
Photographer: Patrick T. Fallon/Bloomberg
California Department of Justice
police agents walk towards a house near Ontario, California on March 5,
2013. Photographer: Patrick T. Fallon/Bloomberg
Special Agent Supervisor John
Marsh with the California Department of Justice drives out to seize
illegal firearms near Ontario, California on March 5, 2013.
Photographer: Patrick T. Fallon/Bloomberg
California is the only state that tracks and disarms people with legally registered guns who have lost the right to own them, according to Attorney General Kamala Harris. Almost 20,000 gun owners in the state are prohibited from possessing firearms, including convicted felons, those under a domestic violence restraining order or deemed mentally unstable.
“What do we do about the guns that are already in the hands of persons who, by law, are considered too dangerous to possess them?” Harris said in a letter to Vice President Joe Biden after a Connecticut school shooting in December left 26 dead. She recommended that Biden, heading a White House review of gun policy, consider California as a national model.
As many as 200,000 people nationwide may no longer be qualified to own firearms, according to Garen Wintemute, director of the Violence Prevention Research Program at the University of California, Davis. Other states may lack confiscation programs because they don’t track purchases as closely as California, which requires most weapons sales go through a licensed dealer and be reported.
“Very, very few states have an archive of firearm owners like we have,” said Wintemute, who helped set up the program.
Funding Increase
Harris, a 48-year-old Democrat, has asked California lawmakers to more than double the number of agents from the current 33. They seized about 2,000 weapons last year. Agents also took 117,000 rounds of ammunition and 11,000 high-capacity magazines, according to state data.“We’re not contacting anybody who can legally own a gun,” said John Marsh, a supervising agent who coordinates the sometimes-contentious seizures. “I got called the Antichrist the other day. Every conspiracy theory you’ve heard of, take that times 10.”
The no-gun list is compiled by cross-referencing files on almost 1 million handgun and assault-weapon owners with databases of new criminal records and involuntary mental-health commitments. About 15 to 20 names are added each day, according to the attorney general’s office.
Probable Cause
Merely being in a database of registered gun owners and having a “disqualifying event,” such as a felony conviction or restraining order, isn’t sufficient evidence for a search warrant, Marsh said March 5 during raids in San Bernardino County. So the agents often must talk their way into a residence to look for weapons, he said.At a house in Fontana, agents were looking for a gun owner with a criminal history of a sex offense, pimping, according to the attorney general’s office. Marsh said that while the woman appeared to be home, they got no answer at the door. Without a warrant, the agents couldn’t enter and had to leave empty- handed.
They had better luck in nearby Upland, where they seized three guns from the home of Lynette Phillips, 48, who’d been hospitalized for mental illness, and her husband, David. One gun was registered to her, two to him.
“The prohibited person can’t have access to a firearm,” regardless of who the registered owner is, said Michelle Gregory, a spokeswoman for the attorney general’s office.
Involuntarily Held
In an interview as agents inventoried the guns, Lynette Phillips said that while she’d been held involuntarily in a mental hospital in December, the nurse who admitted her had exaggerated the magnitude of her condition.Todd Smith, chief executive officer of Aurora Charter Oak Hospital in Covina, where documents provided by Phillips show she was treated, didn’t respond to telephone and e-mail requests for comment on the circumstances of the treatment.
Phillips said her husband used the guns for recreation. She didn’t blame the attorney general’s agents for taking the guns based on the information they had, she said.
“I do feel I have every right to purchase a gun,” Phillips said. “I’m not a threat. We’re law-abiding citizens.”
No one was arrested. Most seized weapons are destroyed, Gregory said.
“It’s not unusual to not arrest a mental-health person because every county in the state handles those particular cases differently,” Gregory said by e-mail. “Unless there’s an extenuating need to arrest them on the spot, we refer the case” to the local district attorney’s office, she said.
Convicted Felons
Agents more often arrest convicted felons who are prohibited from buying, receiving, owning or possessing a firearm, Gregory said. Violation of the ban is itself a felony.The state Senate agreed March 7 to expand the seizure program using $24 million in surplus funds from fees that gun dealers charge buyers for background checks.
Andrew Arulanandam, a spokesman for the National Rifle Association, a gun lobby based in Fairfax, Virginia, that says it has more than 4 million individuals as members, didn’t respond to a request for comment on the program.
Sam Paredes, executive director of the Folsom-based advocacy group Gun Owners of California, praised the program, though not how it is funded.
“We think that crime control instead of gun control is absolutely the way to go,” he said. “The issue we have is funding this program only from resources from law-abiding gun purchasers. This program has a benefit to the entire public and therefore the entire public should be paying through general- fund expenditures, and not just legal gun owners.”
To contact the reporter on this story: Michael B. Marois in Sacramento at mmarois@bloomberg.net James Nash in Los Angeles at jnash24@bloomberg.net.
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Stephen Merelman at smerelman@bloomberg.net
No comments:
Post a Comment