Wednesday, February 20, 2013

Dr. Taitz, Esq. has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.

Dr. Taitz, Esq. has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.

My conversation with Mr. Dennison from SCOTUS blog

Posted on | February 20, 2013 | No Comments
I talked to Mr. Dennison, writer of the SCOTUS blog. I called his cell number 301-512-4731.
He was correct in stating that SCOTUS only denied the STAY as Obama was already sworn in, SCOTUS never commented on the merits of the case, never stated that Obama’s papers are valid.
I asked, why did they sent 5 packets back. He said that they only need the decision of 4 justices to go to the next stage of oral argument. I responded that this looks even more corrupt and treasonous, it means that they sent the remaining packets to 4 liberal justices and 5 conservative justices never saw the papers. He stated that if I feel that the high treason was committed, I should file a complaint with the Justice department. I responded that the Justice department is complicit. I forwarded all the info to Holder and he never responded. I told him that in NAZI Germany they also had a Justice Department, Supreme Court, Parliament and judges, none of whom found one single action by Adolf Hitler to be unconstitutional and that is what we have now in the U.S. He said that he knows, that he is old enough to know what happened in Germany, but he can’t talk further.
Share

legalnews/findlaw.com, one of the 3 largest legal research engines posts my call to report to the judiciary committee of the US Congress to investigate Obama’s use of forged IDs

Posted on | February 20, 2013 | No Comments
Dr. Orly Taitz, Esquire 2 hours ago Extremely important! E-mail the Judiciary committee at KathrynRexrode@mail.house.gov and call at 202-225-3951
legalnews.findlaw.com/article/0cQ43kV5s873C?q… – Cached
Share

My letter to the President of Israel Shimon Peres advising him that he is about to give a medal of distinction to a criminal with forged and stolen IDs, has been picked by Israeli web sites and translated into Hebrew. the link to “Channel 8 Patriotic Israel “is below

Posted on | February 20, 2013 | 4 Comments
Interesting fact: when I tried to fax the letter to President of Israel Shimon Peres, there was a message in Hebrew from the phone company that the fax is blocked. Why would the state department of Israel post on their web site the fax number, which is blocked?
Here is the letter and 137 pages of exhibits  which I am mailing as the fax machine is blocked
 Letter to the President of Israel and 137 pages of exhibits


Dear Orly,

 

Please see the link from Israeli site:

 


 

My best wishes to you & family

 

Yours,

Share

Can someone get me the phone number and e-mail address of Lyle Denniston. He correctly posted on the SCOTUS blog that the decision in Noonan case relates only to the STAY of certification of election, supreme Court never ruled that Obama is a legitimate President, it never ruled that Obama has a single valid ID, that any of the papers he is using are genuine, that Obama is even his legal last name

Posted on | February 20, 2013 | 7 Comments
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lyle_Denniston
Share

Call the home office of the Chair of the Judiciary Committee Bob Goodlatte. I will fly to either home or DC office to present the evidence to him

Posted on | February 20, 2013 | 2 Comments
Orly, I called Congressman Robert Goodlatte, Chairman of House Judicial Committe, district office, at 540-857-2672. The lady that answered was very kind and professional. I explained about the clerks at Supreme Court not noticing judges. I asked for investigation. I got the impression that I was the first caller. I gave her your website to pass on to Congressman. Hope other people call. Keep up you great efforts. Herbert Blazier Ps. my yahoo mail account may be hacked. Every time I try to send mail I have to put in coded letters.
Share

Eric Holder’s “Justice” Department is reminiscent of the “Justice” Department of Franz Gutner in Germany 1933-1941. Same complete disrespect to the Constitution and Justice

Posted on | February 20, 2013 | 2 Comments
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hitler_Cabinet
Share

Noonan et al v Bowen Supplemental Brief to SCOTUS with exhibits

Posted on | February 10, 2013 | 23 Comments
Noonan Suplemental brief draft
Affidavit of Jeffrey Stephan Coffman
Affidavit Al Hendershot corrected
Taitz v Astrue 12.08.2012 letter to SCOTUS
Share

Press release: clerks of the Supreme Court never forwarded to 5 out of 9 Justices one single page of pleadings, they also did not forward to any of the Justices the Supplemental Brief. Demand for investigation forwarded to Congressman Goodlatte, Chair of the Judiciary Committee of Congress

Posted on | February 17, 2013 | 137 Comments


Press release: clerks of the Supreme Court never forwarded to 5 out of 9 Justices one single page of pleadings, they also did not forward to any of the Justices the Supplemental Brief. Demand for investigation forwarded to Congressman Goodlatte, Chair of the Judiciary Committee of Congress
Law offices of orly taitz
29839 santa margarita ste 100
Rancho santa margarita ca 92688
ph. 949-683-5411 fax 949-766-7603
orly.taitz@gmail.com
orlytaitzesq.com

02.16.2013
Via Federal Express
Attn. Congressman Bob Goodlatte
Chairman of the Committee on Judiciary of the U.S. House of Representatives
WASHINGTON, DC OFFICE
2309 Rayburn HOB
Washington, D.C. 20515
Phone: (202) 225-5431
Fax: (202) 225-9681

PETITION FOR AN IMMEDIATE INVESTIGATION IN THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE
EVIDENCE OF EMPLOYEES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES HIDING FROM JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT PLEADINGS AND DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED BY PLAINTIFFS AND ATTORNEYS, REMOVING CASES FROM THE ELECTRONIC DOCKET, EVIDENCE OF BOGUS CONFERENCES OF JUSTICES BEING REPORTED TO THE PUBLIC, WHEN NO CUCH CONFERENCES TOOK PLACES AND THE JUSTICES BEING CLUELESS ABOUT THE VERY EXISTENCES OF HE CASE, EVIDENCE OF CRIMINAL COMPLICITY OF THE EMPLOYEES OF THE SUPREME COURT AND TREASON IN THE MOST SERIOUS CASES DEALING WITH NATIONAL SECURITY.
02.16.2013.
Dear Mr. Goodlatte,
On 12.11. 2013   Attorney Dr. Orly Taitz, ES filed an application for stay on behalf of plaintiffs in Noonan et al v Bowen et al 12 A 606.
On 12.26.2012 Attorney for Plaintiffs resubmitted her application to the Chief Justice John Roberts, who referred the case to the conference of all 9 Justices to be conducted on February 15, 2013. Taitz followed Rule 22 of the Supreme Court that stated “Renewed application is made by a letter to the clerk, designating the Justice to whom the application is to be directed, and accompanied by copies of the original application…” these copies were supposed to be forwarded to 9 individual justices, library of Congress and National Archives.
Clerk for Stays Redmond Barnes sent back to Taitz 5 copies, whereby 5 justices never got the application, so clearly they could not discuss the case during the conference, as they never saw a word of the pleadings or evidence. Taitz submits herein the Exhibit 1, photograph of the original box in which 5 copies were sent back,  as well as the photograph of the stamp. Taitz preserved the box and the documents as evidence.
Moreover, on 02.12.2013 Taitz traveled to Washington DC and submitted to the clerks’ office a supplemental brief with information crucial to the U.S. National Security to be reviewed by the justices prior to the February 15 conference. Taitz talked to clerks Sevgi Tekeli and James Baldin.  She was told to give the pleadings to the guard at the entrance, as the Supreme Court has mandatory screening for anthrax, but the pleadings will be docketed the same day and forwarded to Justices.
The clerks’ office never docketed the Suplemental Brief (Exhibit 2 Supplemental Brief with the date stamp of the Supreme Court) and sent it back, so none of the Justices read the Supplemental Brief as well.
Taitz provides the Judiciary Committee with the application (Exhibit 3) and the Supplementary Brief (Exhibit 2).
    Case at hand was scheduled to be heard on February 15, 2013 in a conference of all the justices of the Supreme Court of the United States.
This case came from the Supreme Court of California and was brought by Presidential Candidates: Edward Noonan, Thomas Gregory MacLeran and Keith Judd  against the Secretary of the State of California, seeking to stay the certification of the votes for the candidate for the U.S. President Barack Obama due to the fact that the aforementioned candidate committed fraud when he provided his declaration of the candidate and when the Democratic party submitted the certificate of the nomination  due to the fact that Barack Obama is not eligible for the position, as he is not a Natural born U.S. citizen, as required by the U.S. Constitution Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5. The declaration of the candidate and the certification of the nomination were based on fraud, on Obama’s use of forged IDs, , stolen Connecticut social Security number xxx-xx-4425, use of a name that was not legally his use of Indonesian citizenship and based on aiding and abetting by corrupt governmental officials. Most notable example of criminal aiding and abetting was signing by the chair of the Democratic Party of Hawaii Brian Schatz a falsified OCON (Official Certificate Of Nomination of a candidate) where the usual wording “eligible according to the provisions of the U.S. Constitution” were removed in order to accommodate ineligible Obama.
Plaintiffs provided the Supreme Court of California and the Supreme Court of the United States with over 100 pages of official records, sworn affidavits of senior law enforcement officials and  experts showing that Barack Obama is:
  1. A citizen of Indonesia, as listed in his school registration #203 from Franciscan Assisi school in Jakarta, Indonesia. As  a citizen of Indonesia Obama was never eligible and never legitimate for the U.S. Presidency.
  2.  Obama is using last name not legally his. Plaintiffs provided this court with the passport records of Stanley Ann Dunham,  deceased mother   of Barack Obama, showing that he is listed under the last name Soebarkah in her passport. He was removed from her passport in August of 1969 pursuant to the request and sworn statement of Ms. Dunham and signed by the U.S. consul in Jakarta Indonesia. As the requirement for removal as listed in the passport,  is obtaining a foreign allegiance, it is believed that Barack Obama Soebarkah was removed from his mother’s passport  when he obtained his Indonesian passport. Barack Obama cannot serve as a U.S. President as the legal entity Barack Obama does not exist. The only legal entity based on the only verifiable record is Barack Obama Soebarkah.
  3. Obama does not have a valid U.S. birth certificate. Plaintiff provided affidavits  from Sheriff of Maricopa County Arizona Joseph Arpaio, Investigator Zullo, experts Felicito Papa, Douglas Vogt, Paul Irey, showing that the image posted by Obama on Whitehouse.gov is a computer generated forgery. When there is a question of authenticity of a document, the only way to authenticate, is to conduct expert evaluation of the original document.  Registrar of the State of Hawaii and Director of Health and Deputy Attorney General of Hawaii in charge of the Health Department were obstructing justice and absolutely refused to comply with any subpoenas and produce the original 1961 birth certificate and as such there was never any authentication of the alleged birth certificate. After 4 years of obstruction of Justice, it is clear that the Hawaiian officials have nothing to show and genuine 1961 birth certificate for Barack Obama simply does not exist.
Obama does not have a valid Selective Service certificate. Based on the affidavit of Sheriff Arpaio and investigator Zullo, alleged copy of Obama’s Selective Service Certificate, is  COMPUTER GENERATED FORGERY. In this   supplemental brief Plaintiffs are providing additional evidence, a sworn affidavit from the Chief investigator of the Special Investigations Unit of the US Coast Guard (ret) and  former special agent of the DHS Jeffrey Stephan Coffman who attested under the penalty of perjury that Obama’s alleged Selective Service registration is a forgery.
Plaintiffs submitted with their TRO and complaint the Affidavits of Sheriff Arpaio and Investigator Zullo and as a supplement an affidavit of the Chief Investigator of the Special investigations of the US Coast Guard Jeffrey Stephan Coffman. Based on those affidavits Obama’s alleged application for the selective service is a forgery. According to  5 USC § 3328.every man born after 1959 has to register with the Selective Service and cannot work in the executive branch if he did not register with the selective service.
(a)An individual—
(1)who was born after December 31, 1959, and is or was required to register under section 3 of the Military Selective Service Act (50 App. U.S.C. 453); and
(2)who is not so registered or knowingly and willfully did not so register before the requirement terminated or became inapplicable to the individual,
shall be ineligible for appointment to a position in an executive agency.
As Obama claims to be born in 1961 (without a valid birth certificate we don’t even know when he was born) he had a duty to register with the Selective Service. A forgery does not represent a registration, as such Obama is not eligible to be working in the executive branch of the U.S. government. He is not eligible to be a President in the White House or a janitor in the White House and it is a duty of this court to exercise its’ jurisdiction to rule Obama not constitutionally eligible.

  1. 4.     Obama’s 2009 tax returns posted by Obama himself on line showed him using a CT Social Security number xxx-xx-4425, which failed both E-verify and SSNVS. Affidavit of investigator Albert Hendershot provided herein as an exhibit showed it being issued to Harrison (Harry ) J. Bounel, born in 1890 in Russia, immigrant to the United States, presumed to be deceased, whose death was either not reported to the SSA or deleted from the computer system by a treasonous and criminally complicit employee of the SSA. Due to Obama’s use of a stolen SSN he is not eligible to work anywhere in the United States, not in the Federal Branch, not in any other branch, not in the private sector, not even to pick tomatoes or clean toilets. Based on his use of a stolen SSN the only thing Obama is eligible to is at least 18 month prison term and deportation. For that reason alone the Supreme Court of California erred in denying the application. This court has to either grant the application or remand it back to the Supreme Court of California for reconsideration.
 315 MILLION U.S. CITIZENS DEMAND TO KNOW, WHO IS COMMITTING TREASON AND AIDING AND ABETTING THE USURPATION OF THE U.S. PRESIDENCY: IS IT DONE BY 9 JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT OR BY THE STAFF ATTORNEYS AND CLERKS OF THE COURT WHO HAVE HIDDEN THE PLEADINGS AND EVIDENCE IN THIS CASE FROM THE JUSTICES
Justices Antonin Scalia in his book “Making your case” p77 described a process of triage in the Supreme Court, he wrote: “Another factor distinctive to petitions for certiorari is that judges don’t like to spend a lot of time deciding what to decide. Indeed in most courts they won’t even read the brief in support of your petition, but will rely on summaries (or on the selection of particular briefs) by law clerks. And law clerks don’t like to spend much time on this job either.”
Unfortunately, the clerks do more than summaries. Taitz, counsel for the plaintiffs submits as Exhibit 3 a recent correspondence with the Supreme Court in regards to case Taitz v Astrue USCA District of Columbia Circuit no 11-5304, where Taitz caught the employees of the Supreme Court actively obstructing justice and tampering with the documents submitted to the Supreme Court.     Taitz provided the court with Federal Express receipts showing packages received by the Supreme Court and signed for by the employees of the Supreme Court, but never docketed and hidden from the Justices of the Supreme Court by the employees. These employees of the court were not appointed by the President, were not confirmed by the Senate, they never took an Oath of Allegiance and nobody knows where their allegiance lies.
This is only one of a number of suspicious activities in the Supreme Court of the
United States. Previously a case Lightfoot v Bowen A-084524 by the same attorney Taitz  was deleted from the docket of the Supreme Court on inauguration day January 21, 2008, ostensibly to give an impression that there are no more challenges to Obama’s legitimacy. Only after the enormous pressure from the public,  media, State Representatives and sworn affidavits from attorneys the case was reentered in the public docket. Clerk in charge for STAYs Danny Bickle repeatedly made incorrect statements claiming that all files were deleted due to some type of computer malfunction, which was not the case. Later, in March of 2009 during a meeting with attorneys and book signing in Los Angeles Taitz was able to discuss the case with Justice Scalia, who was absolutely clueless that the case even existed, even though according to the docket he was a part of the conference of justices who denied that case dealing with the legitimacy of the U.S. President and he voted to deny that case. One can believe that a judge would forget a case about some trivial dispute, but not a case dealing with the U.S. Presidency he supposedly discussed in conference only a month and a half earlier. It is clear that the case Lightfoot v Bowen was decided by the clerks, the names of the justices were printed on the order when the justices had no clue the case even existed. In a case at hand dealing with the usurpation of the U.S. Presidency this is HIGH TREASON, for which guilty parties should be getting a life in prison or death penalty and the nation is entitled to know who these people are.    
In a different case Rhodes v MacDonald 10A56 (entered by the Supreme Court as
Taitz v MacDonald) a docket entry showing Justice Clarence Thomas denying an
application for STAY was made retroactively on a weekend when Justice Thomas was thousands of miles away giving a seminar in Utah. When Taitz demanded to see an actual signature by Justice Thomas on the order to deny stay or on the cover page of the application, she was referred to Eric Fossum, the same
employee, who signed the denial letter in the Taitz v Astrue case, who admitted to her on the phone that there is no signature of Justice Thomas either on the order or on the cover page of the petition. As such, there is no proof justice Thomas ever saw the petition or ever read a word written in the petition. When citizens went to the Supreme Court and requested copies of the pleadings in aforementioned cases, they were told that there are no such documents available.
Noonan v Bowen is a case which provides an undeniable evidence of usurpation of the U.S. Presidency by a criminal, a citizen of Indonesia who claims that his name is Barack Obama, who is using all forged IDs and a stolen Social Security number and a last name not legally his. Allowing this usurpation to go on is an act of HIGH TREASON. The nation has a right to know who is committing high treason: 9 justices of the Supreme Court of clerks, who hide the pleadings and sworn affidavits from justices. For that reason plaintiffs respectfully demand signatures of the justices on the order or on the front page of the application. If there are no actual signatures of the justices the plaintiffs and the nation as a whole will know that the justices never saw a word of pleadings an the case was “ruled upon” by court employees with unknown allegiance.   Plaintiffs also demand to know the names of the court employees who summarized the case, provided it to the justices and compiled the list of approved or denied applications. Plaintiffs, U.S. Congress, law enforcement and World Community at large deserve to know who committed HIGH TREASON, who should be tried for high treason, who should be getting a penalty which is customary in such cases, which is a life in prison or death penalty.
Conclusion:
Plaintiffs and their attorney are demanding an immediate investigation of both the actions of the employees of the Supreme Court of the United States in hiding pleadings and exhibits from the Justices and Barack Obama’s use of forged IDs and a stolen Social Security 042-68-4425.
Not addressing this case represents high treason against the United States of America and people of the United States of America
Respectfully submitted
/s/ Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ

Exhibit 1



Exhibit 2
Noonan supplemental brief with the SCOTUS stamp 02.12.2013
Share

WOW, over 33,000 signatures on my petition for the U.S. Congress to immediately investigate Obama’s use of forged and stolen IDs

Posted on | February 18, 2013 | 11 Comments
Share

Senator Johanns announced that he will retire in 2015. He has nothing to lose, demand that he brings to the floor of the Senate the issue of Obama’s use of forged and stolen IDs

Posted on | February 18, 2013 | 6 Comments
Share

Press release: Commissioner of Social Security defaulted in 2 Circuits, Obama is in default in CA

Posted on | February 18, 2013 | 3 Comments
Press Release
Law offices of Orly Taitz
Commissioner of Social Security administration previously defaulted in RICO (Racketeering case) related to him covering up Obama’s use of a stlen CT Social security number, which was never assigned to him according o E-Verify and SSNVS.
Now he defaulted in yet another circuit: US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Notice of Default and motion for the default judgment was filed in DC.
Obama is currently in default in the US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Judges of these courts have to finally issue a default judgment and order production of all the original documents as part of the post judgment discovery. It is time to put an end to this national nightmare and national disgrace. It is time to end the most egregious case of the elections fraud, forgery and treason.

CM/ECF Case Search Calendar Opinions Orders/Judgments Briefs XML TXT
Logout Help
Court of Appeals Docket #: 11-5304 Docketed: 10/31/2011 Termed: 05/25/2012
Nature of Suit: 2895 Freedom of Information Act of 1974
Orly Taitz v. Michael Astrue
Appeal From:  United States District Court for the District of Columbia
Fee Status:  Fee Paid
Case Type Information:
     1) Civil US
     2) United States
     3)

Originating Court Information:
     District: 0090-1 : 1:11-cv-00402-RCL Lead: 1:11-cv-00402-RCL
     Trial Judge: Royce C. Lamberth, U.S. District Judge     Date Filed: 02/16/2011     Date Order/Judgment:     Date NOA Filed:     08/30/2011     10/25/2011
03/16/2012 Open Restricted Document RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION FILED [1364625] to motion for summary affirmance [1353593-2](Reply to Response by Mail and Response to Cross Motion due on 03/29/2012) combined with a MOTION FILED [STYLED AS "MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF THE APPELLANT"] by Orly Taitz for summary reversal [Service Date: 03/15/2012 by US Mail] Pages: 1-10. [11-5304]
04/27/2012 Open Document MOTION filed [1371429] by Orly Taitz for default judgment. (Response to Motion served by mail due on 05/07/2012) [Service Date: 04/24/2012 by US Mail] Pages: 1-10. [11-5304]
05/25/2012 Open Document PER CURIAM ORDER filed [1375820] denying motion for default judgment [1371429-2]; denying motion for summary reversal [1364625-2]; granting motion for summary affirmance [1353593-2], withholding issuance of the mandate. Before Judges: Rogers, Griffith and Kavanaugh. [11-5304]
06/04/2012 Open Document PETITION filed [1377943] by Appellant Orly Taitz  for rehearing en banc. [Service Date: 05/31/2012 by US Mail] Pages: 16-20. [11-5304]
06/20/2012 Open Restricted Document SUPPLEMENT [1380221] to petition for rehearing en banc [1377943-2] filed by Orly Taitz [Service Date: 06/18/2012] [11-5304]
07/30/2012 Open Document MOTION filed [1387271] by Orly Taitz to recall mandate (Response to Motion served by mail due on 08/09/2012) [Service Date: 07/26/2012 by US Mail] Pages: 1-10. [11-5304]
08/02/2012 Open Document CLERK’S ORDER filed [1387293] Upon consideration of appellant’s motion to recall the mandate, it is ORDERED that the motion be dismissed as moot.  No mandate has issued in this case.  A petition for rehearing en banc remains pending before the court.  The mandate issued July 24, 2012, in No. 11-5306, Taitz v. Ruemmler, where no petition for rehearing was received by the court.  [1387271-2] [11-5304]
08/09/2012 Open Document PER CURIAM ORDER, En Banc, filed [1388336] denying petition for rehearing en banc [1377943-2] Before Judges: Sentelle, Henderson, Rogers, Tatel, Garland, Brown, Griffith and Kavanaugh. [11-5304]
08/29/2012
MANDATE ISSUED to Clerk, District Court [11-5304]
01/29/2013 Open Document MOTION filed [STYLED AS "MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION DUE TO NEW EVIDENCE AND NEW DECISIONS"] [1417882] by Orly Taitz to recall mandate (Response to Motion served by mail due on 02/11/2013) [Service Date: 01/28/2013 by US Mail] Pages: 11-15 with attachments. [11-5304]
IN THE US COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
TAITZ
V
ASTRUE

COURT OF APPEALS NUMBER 11-5304

US DISTRICT COURT NUMBER 11-CV-00402-RCL

NOTICE OF DEFAULT/ FAILURE TO RESPOND BY THE APPELLEE
MOTION FOR JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF THE APPELLANT
Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ
29839 Santa Margarita, ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
Phone 949-683-5411 fax 949-766-7603















Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ, Appellant herein filed a motion for reconsideration/ motion to recall the mandate due to new evidence and new precedents by this court. This court ordered the Appellee, Commissioner of Social Security Administration  to respond by February 11, 2013. As of today, February 18.2013 Appellee did not comply with the court order and failed to respond to the motion. As such Appellant notifies this court the Appellee is in contempt of the court order and in default and therefore the Appellant is respectfully moving this court to grant the Appellants motion for reconsideration /to recall the mandate.

Respectfully submitted

/s/ Orly Taitz, ESQ
Certificate of service
I, Lila Dubert, am over 18 years old, not a party to this case. I attest that I served the Appellee with the attached Notice of Default / Motion for Default Judgment   through his Attorney , Helen Gilbert, Deputy U.S. Attorney by first class mail and/or ECF
555 4th Street, NW
Washington, DC
(202) 252-1900

_____________________________________________________________________________________
Lila Dubert
02.18.2013
Share

On Th 02.14.2013 Commissioner of SSA Michael Astrue left his position and was replaced by acting Commissioner Obama Appointee Carolyn Colvin. Please, write to her and demand immediate investigation of Obama’s use of a stolen CT SSN or resignation

Posted on | February 18, 2013 | 10 Comments

Commissioner of Social Security


Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security

On February 14, 2013, Carolyn W. Colvin became the Acting Commissioner of Social Security. Prior to this designation, she served as the Deputy Commissioner, having been confirmed by the United States Senate on December 22, 2010 as President Obama’s nominee. In addition to her role as the Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Ms. Colvin serves as a Trustee to the Social Security Board of Trustees.
As acting head of the Social Security Administration, Colvin administers the Social Security programs (retirement, survivors and disability), as well as the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) program.
Social Security provides financial protection to more than 158 million workers and their families. It pays approximately $736 billion annually in benefits to more than 55 million Americans who receive monthly retirement, disability or survivors benefits. The SSI program pays monthly benefits to more than 8 million Americans aged, blind or disabled people who have few, if any, resources.
The Social Security Administration is an independent federal agency headquartered in suburban Baltimore with a national workforce of about 62,000 employees and 1,500 facilities nationwide.
Throughout her career, Ms Colvin has managed programs that help people with their healthcare and financial needs. She previously help key executive positions at Social Security Headquarters: Deputy Commissioner for Policy and External Affairs (1994-1996), Deputy Commissioner for Programs and Policy (1996-1998), and Deputy Commissioner for Operations (1998-2001).
Ms. Colvin earned her graduate and undergraduate degrees in business administration from Morgan State University. Additionally, she completed the Senior Executives in State and Local Government Program at Harvard University, the Maryland Leadership Program, and the Greater Baltimore Leadership Program. Ms Colvin is from Maryland and currently resides in Anne Arundel County. She has one son and six grandchildren.
You can write to the Commissioner at the address below:
Carolyn W. Colvin Acting Commissioner Social Security Administration 6401 Security Blvd. Baltimore, MD 21235-0001
Share

need help in research

Posted on | February 18, 2013 | 8 Comments
Michelle Obama’s law license was placed in involuntary inactive status in 1993, only 4 years after she started working as an attorney and when she reportedly had large debts for Princeton and Harvard. This was rather strange, why someone who put so much effort in her education would forfeight her law license, particularly since she said that she and Barack were dead poor and had huge debts.
I got a tip from someone who claimed that she was a court reporter in Florida, that there was a litigation against Obamas after which Michelle’s license was placed in an inactive status and that this law suit was somehow connected to Obama’s use of Bounel’s Social. I do not know if this tip is correct. Just to be on the safe side, please check in the Federal and state courts in FL between 1992-1997 any legal actions under the name Michelle Obama or Michelle Robinson or Michelle Lavonne Robinson. Please, start with the area where Obama is playing golf this weekend.
As I said, this was not verified yet, but it needs to be checked.
here is the tip, it needs to be checked and verified:
Orly..apologies for not giving more complete info, but did not wish to be repetitious as to my identity, for we have had some communication, though I know you get much mail re your case…
I am the former court reporter from Miami, Florida, who reported most of the depositions in a case brought by Ann Dunham re paternity of her son and which culminated in the mid-1990s, and I contacted you early on in that regard… concurrent with Ms. Dunham’s litigation, which was out of Chicago but the depositions were being held in Miami, was also litigation involving possible mortgage money fraud in bank loans by, I believe it was Citigroup. I first became aware of the name Harrison J. Bounel as being the name of the individual to whom an interest in the property now occupied by Obamas in Chicago was granted to Michelle Robinson and Harrison J. Bounel, said interest in property being transferred to them by a fellow by the name of Rezko….
though I was not the reporter in the Citigroup case, that case did go through the court reporting office by whom I was employed, and several of the reporters would ask me to review their transcripts re real estate transactions, and that is when I discovered the name of Harrison J. Bounel within all of the documents that were produced in the Citigroup case. Later in the mid 1990s, I also was the reporter for the final order of the disbarment proceedings against Michelle Robinson (Obama) and her husband Barack Hussein Obama, a case originating out of Cook County, Illinois, but final order being recorded in Miami, Florida, and Michelle Robinson Obama being present. If i recall correctly, we were located within a conference room of the law offices of Moskowitz… sorry, but can’t recall full names at the moment, I have been very very ill… I also recorded the final judicial order of the Court on Ms. Dunham’s original paternity suit that she filed in Chicago, Illinois, and did report some of the hearings in the Citigroup case that were held in Miami, Florida, that case being eventually held in abeyance, but is now required to be ‘of record’…
patricia anderson

I found very few cases under Ann Dunham in Federal courts. A couple of cases have dockets but the actual pleadings are not available. Probably these cases are not connected to Ann Dunham, mother of Obama, but just to check all leads, I am asking my supporters to stop at the court house and get the actual pleadings in the VA case and TX case. Also, I need someone to stop at the circuit court in Honolulu and get all the papers in the divorce proceedings for Ann Dunham in her divorce fromn her first and second husband and of MY Soetoro in her divorce from her first husband. 
Also, if you reside in Miami, please stop at the circuit court in Miami as well as county recorder’s office, please, look in archives for any recordings of judgments involving Ann Dunham, Ann Soetoro, Ann Obama, Barack Obama, Barry Soetoro, Barry Soebarkah, Harry (Harrison )Bounel, Michelle Rbinson, Michelle Obama 



Party Name Court Case NOS Date Filed Date Closed

1 Dunham, Ann (pla) flmdce 8:2003-cv-01997 791 09/23/2003 02/26/2004
2 Dunham, Ann (dft) txndce 5:1991-cv-00252 190 08/26/1991 07/21/1992
3 Dunham, Anne M. (pla) vaedce 1:1996-cv-00215 110 02/21/1996 04/09/1996
4 Dunham, Annie (pla) cacdce 8:2012-cv-01190 710 07/20/2012
5 Dunham, Annie (dft) nyndce 9:2004-cv-00827 550 07/16/2004 06/03/2009



Share

Can someone check, who is this person

Posted on | February 18, 2013 | 7 Comments

I WILL BITCH SLAP YOU 0 approved bitchslapYouHard@eatshitanddie.com 31.170.166.7
Submitted on 2013/02/18 at 5:08 pm
I wish Orly would try to press charges against me. I would be happy to have law enforcement check out her blog entry here where she is giving out a phone number of a private individual AND libeling that person. Then, we could get an attorney to sue her for her disparaging remarks about a private individual.
But as Orly noted, she doesn’t know who I am and even if she did, she has absolutely nothing on me. Writing that her transmission was suppose to fail on the interstate means nothing other than it should have failed. And I DO hope she dies a painful and slow death. My hope would be that she gets in an accident where she’s trapped in her car and it catches on fire and she burns to death.
bitchslapYouHard@eatshitanddie.com
I WILL BITCH SLAP YOU
0
Share
Posted on | February 18, 2013 | No Comments
DonnaLS 6 approved
Submitted on 2013/02/18 at 4:30 pm
Dr. Taitz – what ever happened to this – Today 08/13/2011  I started the process of documenting accusations against Barack H and Michelle L Obama for real estate and tax fraud committed in 02/2006 which are still ongoing as of 2011 on the “buffer zone” parcel of land that was deeded by Rezko to the Trust, Trust # 10209 of The Northern Trust Co. that owns 5046 S Greenwood Ave., Chicago, IL 60615. -Firstly I filed a Tax Fraud Report with the IL Revenue Office in IL http://theobamahustle.wordpress.com/tag/harvey-wineberg/
Share

Election is over, no need for the show, Obama and Reggie Love vacation in FL

Posted on | February 18, 2013 | No Comments

Obama Returns with Reggie Love...
Share

Please, do not run to Panama or Costa Rica, send the criminals on the run!!!

Posted on | February 19, 2013 | 1 Comment
Here is an interesting radio program
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G1B33IvnJ4M&feature=share&list=PL6F41C441C9D9BEED
which echoes what I’ve been saying all along: do not get intimidated by the disinformation, do not run away to Panama and Costa Rica, fight for your land, fight for your home, fight for your rights, send the criminals on the run if they want to avoid prison term. You have to expose corruption, criminality and grand theft in the government, file criminal complaints, be in the face of the congressmen, senators, chiefs of police, sheriffs, demand prosecution of criminals in high positions of power, exercise your 2nd amendment to bear arms, keep in mind there are 315 million of us and 545 of them (Congress, President and the Supreme Court). If you add more corrupt officials and corrupt judges, there are maybe 1000 of them. Not only we can win this battle, defend our Constitutional and civil rights and defend our rights to bear arms, we can win with bare arms.
One of the techniques in overcoming hostage takers, is by hostages charging the hostage takers simultaneously. Even being unarmed they can prevail.
One of the most famous Soviet dissidents, Nathan Sharansky wrote that ultimately Democracy wins, as the regime is like a guard, which is forced to stand guard without rest, day and night. At some point the guard gets tired and puts down his weapon, falls asleep, becomes complacent. People, who are seeking freedom from tyranny will never become complacent until they are free. 
Keep in mind:
a. sun is the best disinfectant
b. the best defense is offense

Share

A 90 year old Socialist Shimon Peres returns a favor to Obama, Netanyahu makes a strategic move in response

Posted on | February 19, 2013 | 1 Comment
Obama regime has trumpeted today ”Israel gives an award to Obama, Israel pro-Obama”
Well, not really, not so fast. What was not explained by the Obama regime, is the following:
the state of Israel, as many western states has two positions:
a. Prime minister. In case of Israel it is Netanyahu who actually leads the government and makes the policy
b. a ceremonial position of the President. The president is not a part of the government, he has no impact on policies.  In a number of nations a constitutional monarch plays such a role of a ceremonial head of state. In Israel the ceremonial head of state is a 90 year old Shimon Peres. Peres is hardly seen or heard from in Israel. He is a former leader of the left wing Labor party. In the latest elections Labor party did poorly, it wasn’t even second in the number of mandates. Last year Peres visited the states and Obama shmoosed the decrepit old socialist with a Presidential Medal of Freedom, even though nobody understood why. But then again Obama was nominated to  a Nobel peace prise after only 12 days in office watching football and holding parties, so why not give a Presidential medal of Freedom to an old socialist and get come mileage out of it.
So, as Obama announced his upcoming visit to Israel, Peres announced that he is reciprocating the favor and giving a medal to Obama. So this exchange of feathers in the hat between two socialists: Obama and Peres, really does not reflect anything in regards to real   allocation of forces on the ground. This in itself was not worthy of much attention and probably has as much meaning as Prince Charles giving some award to a starlet. What was interesting, is they way Netanyahu used this opportunity.
Netanyahu made a public comment welcoming Obama on his upcoming trip to Israel and stated that indeed there is a need for negotiations with Palestinians without preconditions. By saying that he set Obama up. You might ask why so?
  To better explain this I should explain the domestic political environment in Israel. Netanyahu just won the reelection, however Israel is a multiparty state, where 120 seat parliament, Knesset, is comprised of multiple parties. Latest election gave an unexpected large number of mandates to a relative newcomer Yair Lapid. Lapid became the leader of the second largest party in Israel. He is a former talk show host and a son of a former member of the parliament Tommy Lapid. Netanyahu might need to build a coalition with Lapid. (a side note. when I was in Israel, I gave interviews ro a number of TV channels and while in one of the studios I  was introduced to someone who stood in the doorway watching me giving an interview. I was told that this is another talk show host, I could swear it was Lapid, but I might be mistaken). At any rate Lapid is a moderate, however he has no experience in either foreign politics or defense. He ran mostly on domestic issues. One of those issues is a requirement for ultra-orthodox to serve in the military. Netanyahu is an economist, he would like to work with Lapid to strengthen the economy, but he does not want to give concessions to the Palestinians which would endanger the national security. I believe Netanyahu would also like to give one of the key positions  related to security to Yair Shamir, the son of Prime minister Yitzhak Shamir. Shamir is a former air-force officer and had a distinguished career in the Defense industry, both as a governmental official and a sucessful private businessman.
Until now Obama demanded a halt on construction in the Judea and Samaria (West Bank ) as a prerequisite to peace negotiations with Palestinians. To Israelis these demands by Obama make as much sense as a hypothetical demand by Mexico stop all construction in California and Texas as a prerequisite to peace with Mexico because Ca and TX used to be a part of Mexico. This is probably the reason why according to latest surveys Obama’s popularity in Israel is 6%.
  Now there are two possibilities: If Obama responds to the latest statement by Netamyahu by being silent and not demanding that Netanyahu    stop construction in the Judea and Samaria region, then Netanyahu won, he got Obama of his back and can build a coalition and deal with domestic programs.
If Obama responds by contradicting Netanyahu and demanding that Israel stop construction in the Judea and Samaria, then Netanyahu can go to the people of Israel and state: we opened our arms, we gave this president an award, but his demands are unreasonable, these are demands that Obama would never place in front of his own people and we have to do whatever we need to assure our national security. As such Netanyahu would be well positioned to move on with the coalition of his choice.
Another interesting tidbit of information: as Obama and Clinton are traveling to Israel in the end of March, Rubio announced his planned trip to Israel as well. Both parties need Jewish donors for 2014 midterm election.
We’ll see what the next move will be…
Share

Screenshot of the docket at 10:27 am, no decision posted

Posted on | February 19, 2013 | 2 Comments
SCOTUS 02.19.2013
Share

02.19.2013 order from the Supreme Court of the United States does not state whether the case was granted or denied, no answer yet, no treason yet by the justices of the Supreme Court. See the order at link below

Posted on | February 19, 2013 | 21 Comments
SCOTUS 02.19.2013 order does not state yet whether the case was granted or denied, no decision yet
Share

We are proceeding with the demand for the hearing in the Judiciary committee: 5 justices never received the applications, none received the supplemental brief, no signatures anywhere

Posted on | February 19, 2013 | 39 Comments
Press release
Law offices of Orly Taitz
Attorney Orly Taitz continues with the demand for the Judiciary Committee to investigate the fact that 5 out 9 Justices of the Supreme Court never saw the casesupposedly heard in conference by the Supreme Court and all 9 never saw the supplemental brief filed with SCOTUS, as 5 original sets of briefs were sent  back and all supplemental briefs were sent back and never docketed.
An order by the Supreme Court shows a notation after case 12A712 applications denied, which appear to relate to case 12A606, however evidence shows that the case was not heard at all as 5 out of 9 Justices never even got a packet with pleadings.
There are 7 other cases that are proceeding in other courts.
While a part of those cases might be considered moot, such as stays of certifications, the bulk of the cases is  not moot, such as Declaratory Relief and RICO (racketeering) cases.
Overwhelming and never refuted evidence shows Barack Obama using a Connecticut Social Security number 042-68-4425, which was never assigned to him according to E-Verify and SSNVS. Sworn affidavit of Chief investigator of special Investigations unit of the U.S. Coast Guard shows Obama using a forged Selective Service Certificate and multiple experts showed the alleged copy of Obama’s birth certificate to be a forgery. In a case in MS, which included the RICO charges, Obama’s personal attorneys submitted a new copy of the birth certificate, which according to experts represents a forgery of a forgery, which was made to minimize the white halo   effect around the letters. This white halo effect created by computer manipulation made the initial forgery released on April 27, 2011 a complete joke.
For four and a half years now in spite of multiple legal actions, not one single judge or jury ever saw an original 1961 birth certificate for Obama, original selective service certificate or original SS-5 application for the Social Security number 042-68-4425, which Obama claims to be assigned to him.
Due to lack of any original documents and a mountain of evidence showing the alleged copies to be crude forgeries,  it is safe to assume ”original documents” never existed.
Please, keep in mind: if  a criminal and his accomplices in high places could steal the U.S. Presidency, the White House, they can steal your house, they can steal anything.
Current policies and proposals by Obama devalued the U.S. dollar by incurring 6.5 trillion  debt in 4 years, this devalues the savings of every American. Recent proposed for a sweeping amnesty for at least 11 million illegals (real number range from 30-42 million illegals residing in the U.S.) will further destroy the U.S. job market and further bankrupt the U.S. economy. Recent proposals limiting the second amendment rights will take away the citizens rights to fight the dictatorial regime.
We have a citizen of Indonesia Barry Soebarkah, aka Barry Soetoro, claiming to be Barack Obama, who is usurping the U.S. Presidency with forged and stolen IDs. Obama defaulted in the Eastern District of California. Commissioner of Social Security defaulted in two cases: in MS and DC. both obama and Commissioner of Social Security  have nothing to negate the evidence against them.
Please, remember Nixon was forced to resign 6 month after he was reelected. It is up to you, up to each and every American to fight this criminal enterprise ruling the country and regain some decensy and some constitutional and civil rights. If you do not fight for your rights, the ruling criminal enterprise will take away more and more of your rights.
Liberty does not come cheap, you have to fight for your rights. Every American has to join the protests in front of the Federal buildings, offices of congressmen and senators and demand immediate hearing in the US Congress of Obama’s use of forged and stolen IDs. Now there are over 33,000    signatures on the petition by attorney Taitz for the U.S. Congress to investigate Obama’s fored IDs. To sign the petition, please, go to the website OrlyTaitzESQ.com. In the right upper corner of the first page of the web site  there is a picture of statue of Liberty with a red button “take action”. Please, click that button, it will lead you to the petition.
Every American citizen is urged to call each and every member of the U.S. House of Represntatives Committee for the Judiciary and demand investigation of Obama’s use of forged IDs and a stolen SSN.
Every American is urged to protest in front of the outlets of the controlled and censored puppet U.S. main stream media, which is indistinguishable in its emptiness from the official media of the Stalinist Soviet Union, Maoist China, Jihadist Iran or NAZI Germany in 1930s. If we do not protest this power grab by this foreign national with forged IDs Soebarkah-Soetoro-Obama, United States of America will resemble Germany in 1940s.
An official complaint of deprivation of the civil and constitutional rights in the United States, including the right to participate in lawful eletions is being filed with the Inter American Commission for Human Rights.
Together we will prevail and together we will defeat the criminal enterpise running this nation.
Law offices of Orly Taitz
29829 Santa Margarita ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
orly.taitzesq.com orly.taitz@gmail.com
for emergencies only call 949-683-5411
Share
Posted on | February 19, 2013 | No Comments
steve
2 approved
God bless you, Orly. This is truly a David vs. Goliath battle for the truth. Not a lot of hope here….Our government has been taken over by hostile forces with a dedication to the destruction of America, and we are powerless to do anything about it??? It seems that the only one in the country with the balls to stand against this travesty is a woman…namely, you, Orly. I will be proud to stand with you against these assholes…
 
Share

No answer from the 5th circuit court of Appeals on my motion to expedite the Default Judgment against the commissioner of Social Security in RICO (Racketeering) case against Obama and his accomplices in his use of forged and stolen IDs. Please, contact the 5th circuit court of Appels, ask to expedite the emergency motion sitting there for over a month

Posted on | February 19, 2013 | 3 Comments
CM/ECF Case Search Calendar Opinions Orders/Judgments Briefs XML TXT
Logout Help

 
Court of Appeals Docket #: 13-60024 Docketed: 01/10/2013
In re: Orly Taitz
Appeal From: Southern District of Mississippi, Jackson
Fee Status: fee paid
Case Type Information:
1) Original Proceedings
2) NP Mandamus
3)
 
Originating Court Information:
District: 0538-3 : 3:12-CV-280
Originating Judge: Henry T. Wingate, Chief JudgeDate Rec’d COA:01/10/2013

 

01/10/2013   ORIGINAL PROCEEDING CASE docketed. [13-60024] (MRW)
01/10/2013 Open Document PETITION filed by Petitioner Dr. Orly Taitz for writ of mandamus [7268373-2] Date received in 5th Circuit: 01/10/2013. Fee due on 02/11/2013 for Petitioner Orly Taitz. Date of Service: 01/09/2013 [13-60024] (MRW)
01/10/2013   FEE PAID by Petitioner Dr. Orly Taitz. Fee deadline satisfied [13-60024] (MRW)
Share

DC circuit did not post the notice of default yet. Please, contact the clerks’ office, ask to docket the notice ASAP

Posted on | February 19, 2013 | 5 Comments
  Case Search Calendar Opinions Orders/Judgments Briefs XML TXT
Logout Help

Court of Appeals Docket #: 11-5304 Docketed: 10/31/2011
Termed: 05/25/2012
Nature of Suit: 2895 Freedom of Information Act of 1974
Orly Taitz v. Michael Astrue
Appeal From: United States District Court for the District of Columbia
Fee Status: Fee Paid
Case Type Information:
1) Civil US
2) United States
3)
 
Originating Court Information:
District: 0090-1 : 1:11-cv-00402-RCL Lead: 1:11-cv-00402-RCL
Trial Judge: Royce C. Lamberth, U.S. District JudgeDate Filed: 02/16/2011Date Order/Judgment:Date NOA Filed:08/30/201110/25/2011

 

03/16/2012 Open Restricted Document RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION FILED [1364625] to motion for summary affirmance [1353593-2](Reply to Response by Mail and Response to Cross Motion due on 03/29/2012) combined with a MOTION FILED [STYLED AS "MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF THE APPELLANT"] by Orly Taitz for summary reversal [Service Date: 03/15/2012 by US Mail] Pages: 1-10. [11-5304]
04/27/2012 Open Document MOTION filed [1371429] by Orly Taitz for default judgment. (Response to Motion served by mail due on 05/07/2012) [Service Date: 04/24/2012 by US Mail] Pages: 1-10. [11-5304]
05/25/2012 Open Document PER CURIAM ORDER filed [1375820] denying motion for default judgment [1371429-2]; denying motion for summary reversal [1364625-2]; granting motion for summary affirmance [1353593-2], withholding issuance of the mandate. Before Judges: Rogers, Griffith and Kavanaugh. [11-5304]
06/04/2012 Open Document PETITION filed [1377943] by Appellant Orly Taitz for rehearing en banc. [Service Date: 05/31/2012 by US Mail] Pages: 16-20. [11-5304]
06/20/2012 Open Restricted Document SUPPLEMENT [1380221] to petition for rehearing en banc [1377943-2] filed by Orly Taitz [Service Date: 06/18/2012] [11-5304]
07/30/2012 Open Document MOTION filed [1387271] by Orly Taitz to recall mandate (Response to Motion served by mail due on 08/09/2012) [Service Date: 07/26/2012 by US Mail] Pages: 1-10. [11-5304]
08/02/2012 Open Document CLERK’S ORDER filed [1387293] Upon consideration of appellant’s motion to recall the mandate, it is ORDERED that the motion be dismissed as moot. No mandate has issued in this case. A petition for rehearing en banc remains pending before the court. The mandate issued July 24, 2012, in No. 11-5306, Taitz v. Ruemmler, where no petition for rehearing was received by the court. [1387271-2] [11-5304]
08/09/2012 Open Document PER CURIAM ORDER, En Banc, filed [1388336] denying petition for rehearing en banc [1377943-2] Before Judges: Sentelle, Henderson, Rogers, Tatel, Garland, Brown, Griffith and Kavanaugh. [11-5304]
08/29/2012   MANDATE ISSUED to Clerk, District Court [11-5304]
01/29/2013 Open Document MOTION filed [STYLED AS "MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION DUE TO NEW EVIDENCE AND NEW DECISIONS"] [1417882] by Orly Taitz to recall mandate (Response to Motion served by mail due on 02/11/2013) [Service Date: 01/28/2013 by US Mail] Pages: 11-15 with attachments. [11-5304]
Share

Extremely important! E-mail the Judiciary committee at KathrynRexrode@mail.house.gov and call at 202-225-3951

Posted on | February 19, 2013 | 29 Comments
Press release
Law Offics of Orly Taitz
Every law abiding U.S. citizen is urged to e-mail and call the Judiciary Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives c/o staff member
c/o Committee staff member KathrynRexrode. 
Kathryn.Rexrode@mail.house.gov
  202-225-3951
and demanded immediate hearing on the issue of Barack Obama’s use of forged IDs and a CT SSN, which failed both E-Verify and SSNVS, as well as criminal complicity and cover up by high ranking officials of the U.S. Government, Social Security Administration and employees of a number of courts. Over 34,000 citizens signed this petition as can be seen on OrlyTaitzESQ.com.  34,000 U.S. citizens are demanding an immediate hearing on this most important issue of elections fraud, forgery and treason

Attention Judiciary Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives
Attention Chairman Congressman Bob Goodlatte
c/o Committee staff member KathrynRexrode.  
KathrynRexrode@mail.house.gov
  202-225-3951

Press release: clerks of the Supreme Court never forwarded to 5 out of 9 Justices one single page of pleadings, they also did not forward to any of the Justices the Supplemental Brief. Demand for investigation forwarded to Congressman Goodlatte, Chair of the Judiciary Committee of Congress

Noonan v Bowen application for STAY Supreme Court of the U.S. Roberts
Press release: clerks of the Supreme Court never forwarded to 5 out of 9 Justices one single page of pleadings, they also did not forward to any of the Justices the Supplemental Brief. Demand for investigation forwarded to Congressman Goodlatte, Chair of the Judiciary Committee of Congress
Law offices of orly taitz
29839 santa margarita ste 100
Rancho santa margarita ca 92688
ph. 949-683-5411 fax 949-766-7603
orly.taitz@gmail.com
orlytaitzesq.com
02.16.2013
Via Federal Express
Attn. Congressman Bob Goodlatte
Chairman of the Committee on Judiciary of the U.S. House of Representatives
WASHINGTON, DC OFFICE
2309 Rayburn HOB Washington, D.C. 20515 Phone: (202) 225-5431 Fax: (202) 225-9681

PETITION FOR AN IMMEDIATE INVESTIGATION IN THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE
EVIDENCE OF EMPLOYEES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES HIDING FROM JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT PLEADINGS AND DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED BY PLAINTIFFS AND ATTORNEYS, REMOVING CASES FROM THE ELECTRONIC DOCKET, EVIDENCE OF BOGUS CONFERENCES OF JUSTICES BEING REPORTED TO THE PUBLIC, WHEN NO CUCH CONFERENCES TOOK PLACES AND THE JUSTICES BEING CLUELESS ABOUT THE VERY EXISTENCES OF HE CASE, EVIDENCE OF CRIMINAL COMPLICITY OF THE EMPLOYEES OF THE SUPREME COURT AND TREASON IN THE MOST SERIOUS CASES DEALING WITH NATIONAL SECURITY.
02.16.2013.
Dear Mr. Goodlatte,
On 12.11. 2013   Attorney Dr. Orly Taitz, ES filed an application for stay on behalf of plaintiffs in Noonan et al v Bowen et al 12 A 606.
On 12.26.2012 Attorney for Plaintiffs resubmitted her application to the Chief Justice John Roberts, who referred the case to the conference of all 9 Justices to be conducted on February 15, 2013. Taitz followed Rule 22 of the Supreme Court that stated “Renewed application is made by a letter to the clerk, designating the Justice to whom the application is to be directed, and accompanied by copies of the original application…” these copies were supposed to be forwarded to 9 individual justices, library of Congress and National Archives.
Clerk for Stays Redmond Barnes sent back to Taitz 5 copies, whereby 5 justices never got the application, so clearly they could not discuss the case during the conference, as they never saw a word of the pleadings or evidence. Taitz submits herein the Exhibit 1, photograph of the original box in which 5 copies were sent back,  as well as the photograph of the stamp. Taitz preserved the box and the documents as evidence.
Moreover, on 02.12.2013 Taitz traveled to Washington DC and submitted to the clerks’ office a supplemental brief with information crucial to the U.S. National Security to be reviewed by the justices prior to the February 15 conference. Taitz talked to clerks Sevgi Tekeli and James Baldin.  She was told to give the pleadings to the guard at the entrance, as the Supreme Court has mandatory screening for anthrax, but the pleadings will be docketed the same day and forwarded to Justices.
The clerks’ office never docketed the Suplemental Brief (Exhibit 2 Supplemental Brief with the date stamp of the Supreme Court) and sent it back, so none of the Justices read the Supplemental Brief as well.
Taitz provides the Judiciary Committee with the application (Exhibit 3) and the Supplementary Brief (Exhibit 2).
Case at hand was scheduled to be heard on February 15, 2013 in a conference of all the justices of the Supreme Court of the United States.
This case came from the Supreme Court of California and was brought by Presidential Candidates: Edward Noonan, Thomas Gregory MacLeran and Keith Judd  against the Secretary of the State of California, seeking to stay the certification of the votes for the candidate for the U.S. President Barack Obama due to the fact that the aforementioned candidate committed fraud when he provided his declaration of the candidate and when the Democratic party submitted the certificate of the nomination  due to the fact that Barack Obama is not eligible for the position, as he is not a Natural born U.S. citizen, as required by the U.S. Constitution Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5. The declaration of the candidate and the certification of the nomination were based on fraud, on Obama’s use of forged IDs, , stolen Connecticut social Security number xxx-xx-4425, use of a name that was not legally his use of Indonesian citizenship and based on aiding and abetting by corrupt governmental officials. Most notable example of criminal aiding and abetting was signing by the chair of the Democratic Party of Hawaii Brian Schatz a falsified OCON (Official Certificate Of Nomination of a candidate) where the usual wording “eligible according to the provisions of the U.S. Constitution” were removed in order to accommodate ineligible Obama.
Plaintiffs provided the Supreme Court of California and the Supreme Court of the United States with over 100 pages of official records, sworn affidavits of senior law enforcement officials and  experts showing that Barack Obama is:
  1. A citizen of Indonesia, as listed in his school registration #203 from Franciscan Assisi school in Jakarta, Indonesia. As  a citizen of Indonesia Obama was never eligible and never legitimate for the U.S. Presidency.
  2. Obama is using last name not legally his. Plaintiffs provided this court with the passport records of Stanley Ann Dunham,  deceased mother   of Barack Obama, showing that he is listed under the last name Soebarkah in her passport. He was removed from her passport in August of 1969 pursuant to the request and sworn statement of Ms. Dunham and signed by the U.S. consul in Jakarta Indonesia. As the requirement for removal as listed in the passport,  is obtaining a foreign allegiance, it is believed that Barack Obama Soebarkah was removed from his mother’s passport  when he obtained his Indonesian passport. Barack Obama cannot serve as a U.S. President as the legal entity Barack Obama does not exist. The only legal entity based on the only verifiable record is Barack Obama Soebarkah.
  3. Obama does not have a valid U.S. birth certificate. Plaintiff provided affidavits  from Sheriff of Maricopa County Arizona Joseph Arpaio, Investigator Zullo, experts Felicito Papa, Douglas Vogt, Paul Irey, showing that the image posted by Obama on Whitehouse.gov is a computer generated forgery. When there is a question of authenticity of a document, the only way to authenticate, is to conduct expert evaluation of the original document.  Registrar of the State of Hawaii and Director of Health and Deputy Attorney General of Hawaii in charge of the Health Department were obstructing justice and absolutely refused to comply with any subpoenas and produce the original 1961 birth certificate and as such there was never any authentication of the alleged birth certificate. After 4 years of obstruction of Justice, it is clear that the Hawaiian officials have nothing to show and genuine 1961 birth certificate for Barack Obama simply does not exist.
Obama does not have a valid Selective Service certificate. Based on the affidavit of Sheriff Arpaio and investigator Zullo, alleged copy of Obama’s Selective Service Certificate, is  COMPUTER GENERATED FORGERY. In this   supplemental brief Plaintiffs are providing additional evidence, a sworn affidavit from the Chief investigator of the Special Investigations Unit of the US Coast Guard (ret) and  former special agent of the DHS Jeffrey Stephan Coffman who attested under the penalty of perjury that Obama’s alleged Selective Service registration is a forgery.
Plaintiffs submitted with their TRO and complaint the Affidavits of Sheriff Arpaio and Investigator Zullo and as a supplement an affidavit of the Chief Investigator of the Special investigations of the US Coast Guard Jeffrey Stephan Coffman. Based on those affidavits Obama’s alleged application for the selective service is a forgery. According to  5 USC § 3328.every man born after 1959 has to register with the Selective Service and cannot work in the executive branch if he did not register with the selective service.
(a)An individual—
(1)who was born after December 31, 1959, and is or was required to register under section 3 of the Military Selective Service Act (50 App. U.S.C. 453); and
(2)who is not so registered or knowingly and willfully did not so register before the requirement terminated or became inapplicable to the individual,
shall be ineligible for appointment to a position in an executive agency.
As Obama claims to be born in 1961 (without a valid birth certificate we don’t even know when he was born) he had a duty to register with the Selective Service. A forgery does not represent a registration, as such Obama is not eligible to be working in the executive branch of the U.S. government. He is not eligible to be a President in the White House or a janitor in the White House and it is a duty of this court to exercise its’ jurisdiction to rule Obama not constitutionally eligible.

  1. 4.     Obama’s 2009 tax returns posted by Obama himself on line showed him using a CT Social Security number xxx-xx-4425, which failed both E-verify and SSNVS. Affidavit of investigator Albert Hendershot provided herein as an exhibit showed it being issued to Harrison (Harry ) J. Bounel, born in 1890 in Russia, immigrant to the United States, presumed to be deceased, whose death was either not reported to the SSA or deleted from the computer system by a treasonous and criminally complicit employee of the SSA. Due to Obama’s use of a stolen SSN he is not eligible to work anywhere in the United States, not in the Federal Branch, not in any other branch, not in the private sector, not even to pick tomatoes or clean toilets. Based on his use of a stolen SSN the only thing Obama is eligible to is at least 18 month prison term and deportation. For that reason alone the Supreme Court of California erred in denying the application. This court has to either grant the application or remand it back to the Supreme Court of California for reconsideration.
315 MILLION U.S. CITIZENS DEMAND TO KNOW, WHO IS COMMITTING TREASON AND AIDING AND ABETTING THE USURPATION OF THE U.S. PRESIDENCY: IS IT DONE BY 9 JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT OR BY THE STAFF ATTORNEYS AND CLERKS OF THE COURT WHO HAVE HIDDEN THE PLEADINGS AND EVIDENCE IN THIS CASE FROM THE JUSTICES
Justices Antonin Scalia in his book “Making your case” p77 described a process of triage in the Supreme Court, he wrote: “Another factor distinctive to petitions for certiorari is that judges don’t like to spend a lot of time deciding what to decide. Indeed in most courts they won’t even read the brief in support of your petition, but will rely on summaries (or on the selection of particular briefs) by law clerks. And law clerks don’t like to spend much time on this job either.”
Unfortunately, the clerks do more than summaries. Taitz, counsel for the plaintiffs submits as Exhibit 3 a recent correspondence with the Supreme Court in regards to case Taitz v Astrue USCA District of Columbia Circuit no 11-5304, where Taitz caught the employees of the Supreme Court actively obstructing justice and tampering with the documents submitted to the Supreme Court.     Taitz provided the court with Federal Express receipts showing packages received by the Supreme Court and signed for by the employees of the Supreme Court, but never docketed and hidden from the Justices of the Supreme Court by the employees. These employees of the court were not appointed by the President, were not confirmed by the Senate, they never took an Oath of Allegiance and nobody knows where their allegiance lies.
This is only one of a number of suspicious activities in the Supreme Court of the
United States. Previously a case Lightfoot v Bowen A-084524 by the same attorney Taitz  was deleted from the docket of the Supreme Court on inauguration day January 21, 2008, ostensibly to give an impression that there are no more challenges to Obama’s legitimacy. Only after the enormous pressure from the public,  media, State Representatives and sworn affidavits from attorneys the case was reentered in the public docket. Clerk in charge for STAYs Danny Bickle repeatedly made incorrect statements claiming that all files were deleted due to some type of computer malfunction, which was not the case. Later, in March of 2009 during a meeting with attorneys and book signing in Los Angeles Taitz was able to discuss the case with Justice Scalia, who was absolutely clueless that the case even existed, even though according to the docket he was a part of the conference of justices who denied that case dealing with the legitimacy of the U.S. President and he voted to deny that case. One can believe that a judge would forget a case about some trivial dispute, but not a case dealing with the U.S. Presidency he supposedly discussed in conference only a month and a half earlier. It is clear that the case Lightfoot v Bowen was decided by the clerks, the names of the justices were printed on the order when the justices had no clue the case even existed. In a case at hand dealing with the usurpation of the U.S. Presidency this is HIGH TREASON, for which guilty parties should be getting a life in prison or death penalty and the nation is entitled to know who these people are.
In a different case Rhodes v MacDonald 10A56 (entered by the Supreme Court as
Taitz v MacDonald) a docket entry showing Justice Clarence Thomas denying an
application for STAY was made retroactively on a weekend when Justice Thomas was thousands of miles away giving a seminar in Utah. When Taitz demanded to see an actual signature by Justice Thomas on the order to deny stay or on the cover page of the application, she was referred to Eric Fossum, the same
employee, who signed the denial letter in the Taitz v Astrue case, who admitted to her on the phone that there is no signature of Justice Thomas either on the order or on the cover page of the petition. As such, there is no proof justice Thomas ever saw the petition or ever read a word written in the petition. When citizens went to the Supreme Court and requested copies of the pleadings in aforementioned cases, they were told that there are no such documents available.
Noonan v Bowen is a case which provides an undeniable evidence of usurpation of the U.S. Presidency by a criminal, a citizen of Indonesia who claims that his name is Barack Obama, who is using all forged IDs and a stolen Social Security number and a last name not legally his. Allowing this usurpation to go on is an act of HIGH TREASON. The nation has a right to know who is committing high treason: 9 justices of the Supreme Court of clerks, who hide the pleadings and sworn affidavits from justices. For that reason plaintiffs respectfully demand signatures of the justices on the order or on the front page of the application. If there are no actual signatures of the justices the plaintiffs and the nation as a whole will know that the justices never saw a word of pleadings an the case was “ruled upon” by court employees with unknown allegiance.   Plaintiffs also demand to know the names of the court employees who summarized the case, provided it to the justices and compiled the list of approved or denied applications. Plaintiffs, U.S. Congress, law enforcement and World Community at large deserve to know who committed HIGH TREASON, who should be tried for high treason, who should be getting a penalty which is customary in such cases, which is a life in prison or death penalty.
Conclusion:
Plaintiffs and their attorney are demanding an immediate investigation of both the actions of the employees of the Supreme Court of the United States in hiding pleadings and exhibits from the Justices and Barack Obama’s use of forged IDs and a stolen Social Security 042-68-4425.
Not addressing this case represents high treason against the United States of America and people of the United States of America
Respectfully submitted
/s/ Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ

Exhibit 1



Exhibit 2
Noonan supplemental brief with the SCOTUS stamp 02.12.2013
Exhibit 3
Noonan v Bowen application for STAY Supreme Court of the U.S. Roberts

Share
Share

Correction in the e-mail for Kathryn Rexrode Judiciary Committee there is a period after the first name and before the last name. It is Kathryn.Rexrode@mail.house.gov

Posted on | February 19, 2013 | 17 Comments

Editor of Molokai-News George Peobody forwarded

Congress Judiciary Committee Investigate Treason and Fraud and Obstruction of Justice







Inbox

x





EditorMolokai Advertiser-News George Peabody
4:34 PM (13 minutes ago)

to Kathryn.Rexrode
Please REPLY to confirm receipt of this message.
Dear Judiciary Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives c/o Committee staff member KathrynRexrode.
Please initiate immediate a hearing on the issue of Barack Obama’s use of forged IDs and a CT SSN, which failed both E-Verify and SSNVS, as well as criminal complicity and cover up by high ranking officials of the U.S. Government, Social Security Administration and employees of a number of courts.
Investigation to start with these:
1.  Is  Harry J. Bounel the President of the United States who filed his 2009 federal tax return using his lawfully issued Social Security #042-68-4425?   AND, why is Barack H. Obama II aka Barry Soetoro using on his 2009 federal tax return a stolen Social Security #042-68-4425, that belongs to one of his wife’s relatives named Harrison J. Bounel whose date of birth was 1890?
2.  Barack H. Obama II aka Barry Soetoro admitted in 1991 publication of his bio that he was born in Kenya and raised in Hawaii.  Since then his grandmother provided his Kenyan birth certificate and stated she was present at his birth in Kenya;  and Obama/Soetoro and Michelle Obama have stated that Kenya is the land of his birth; and Prior to Obama’s ensconcement to the White House, many international stories also stated that Obama was Kenyan-born as did members of Kenya’s legislative assembly who celebrated for the record about their Kenyan boy who rules the United States of America.  Furthermore, it has been reported that Obama administration has paid nearly $4 billion dollars for capital projects in Kenya since Obama usurpation of POTUS.    Obama’s Hawaii birth certificate is an obvious fraud and a forgery, his Selective Service registration are destroyed by Obama’s EO, Obama’s SS# failed when checked through both  E-Verify and the Social Security Number Verification  Service.
3  Does this Judiciary Committee agree that anyone who obtained a federal government position of employment without verification of their identity should be immediately arrested and investigated as a possible domestic terrorist, and why are so many records destroyed or unavailable:  Obama’s mother’s passport records before 1965 were destroyed;  immigration records from August 1961, and Obama’s selective service application destroyed;  and, Obama’s purported original birth certificate of Hawaii is non-existent and a forgery is presented —even Hawaii governor Abercrombie admitted he could not find Obama’s BC in Hawaii;  Obama’s Social Security number is a stolen Connecticut SSN 042-68-4425 which was originally issued to Harrison J. Bounel who was born in 1890?
4.  What passport did Obama/Soetoro use when you traveled to Pakistan in 1981?
5.  Why did Obama sign the EO to extend Secrete Service protection for himself and W-Bush for Life instead of leaving it at 10-years?  Protecting elite CRIMINALS ? !!
6……etc, etc 1000 at least more questions to investigate about the Fraud President Barack H. Obama II
And, Impeach his now.  AND  ARREST Obama NOW into custody of US Marshalls in solitary until trial as domestic terrorist!
Please forward this message to all of the below and current Congresspeople and Senators.
mahalos,  George Peabody   http://www.MolokaiAdvertiserNews.com    808-558-8253
UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES and SENATORS
Anibal@mail.house.gov, gary_ackerman@mail.house.gov, jay.inslee@mail.house.gov, rick.larsen@mail.house.gov, brian.baird@mail.house.gov, adam.smith@mail.house.gov, senator@boxer.senate.gov, lynn.woolsey@mail.house.gov, George.Miller@mail.house.gov, sf.nancy@mail.house.gov, barbara.lee@mail.house.gov, budmail@mail.house.gov, budmail@mail.house.gov, snyder.congress@mail.house.gov, faleomavaega@mail.house.gov, ed.pastor@mail.house.gov, democratic.caucus@mail.house.gov, lynn.woolsey@mail.house.gov, zoegram@lofgren.house.gov, samfarr@mail.house.gov, gary.condit@mail.house.gov, lois.capps@mail.house.gov, brad.sherman@mail.house.gov, Howard.Berman@mail.house.gov, arcoiris@mail.house.gov, Rep.Harman@mail.house.gov, Millender.McDonald@mail.house.gov, talk2geb@mail.house.gov, loretta@mail.house.gov, degette@mail.house.gov, david.skaggs@mail.house.gov, Kennelly@mail.house.gov, bozrah@mail.house.gov, rep.boyd@mail.house.gov, thurman@mail.house.gov, pdeutsch.pub@mail.house.gov, alcee.pubhastings@mail.house.gov, cymck@mail.house.gov, john.lewis@mail.house.gov, guamtodc@mail.house.gov, neil.abercrombie@mail.house.gov, leach.ia01@mail.house.gov, rep.boswell.ia03@mail.house.gov, bobby.rush@mail.house.gov, luis.gutierrez@mail.house.gov, danny.davis@mail.house.gov, sidney.yates@mail.house.gov, jfc.il12@mail.house.gov, lane.evans@mail.house.gov, tim.roemer@mail.house.gov, in09.wyr@housemail.house.gov, rep.carson@mail.house.gov, john.olver@mail.house.gov, jim.mcgovern@mail.house.gov, mtmeehan@mail.house.gov, joe.moakley@mail.house.gov, william.delahunt@mail.house.gov, rep.cardin@mail.house.gov, rep.tomallen@mail.house.gov, stupak@mail.house.gov, jim.barcia-pub@mail.house.gov, debbie.stabenow@mail.house.gov, dkildee@mail.house.gov, david.bonior@mail.house.gov, slevin@mail.house.gov, john.conyers@mail.house.gov, martin.sabo@mail.house.gov, tell.bill@mail.house.gov, tocollin.peterson@mail.house.gov, oberstar@mail.house.gov, gephardt@mail.house.gov, ike.skelton@mail.house.gov, thompsonms2nd@mail.house.gov, gene.taylor@mail.house.gov, EClayton1@mail.house.gov, bob.etheridge@mail.house.gov, david.price@mail.house.gov, CongMcIntyre@mail.house.gov, nc12.public@mail.house.gov, Rep.Earl.Pomeroy@mail.house.gov, rob.andrews@mail.house.gov, bill.pascrell@mail.house.gov, steven.rothman@mail.house.gov, thomas.manton@mail.house.gov, jerrold.nadler@mail.house.gov, major.owens@mail.house.gov, rep.carolyn.maloney@mail.house.gov, rangel@mail.house.gov, jserrano@mail.house.gov, mike.mcnulty@mail.house.gov, mhinchey@mail.house.gov, louiseny@mail.house.gov, mike.oxley@mail.house.gov, ted.strickland@mail.house.gov, rep.kaptur@mail.house.gov, sherrod@mail.house.gov, telljim@mail.house.gov, rep.elizabeth.furse@mail.house.gov, write.earl@mail.house.gov, peter.defazio@mail.house.gov, darlene@mail.house.gov, paul.kanjorski@mail.house.gov, murtha@mail.house.gov, mchale@mail.house.gov, rep.doyle@mail.house.gov, robert.weygand@mail.house.gov, jclyburn@mail.house.gov, bob.clement@mail.house.gov, bart.gordon@mail.house.gov, john.tanner@mail.house.gov, hford@hr.house.gov, max.sandlin@mail.house.gov, rmhall@mail.house.gov, nick.lampson@mail.house.gov, lloyd.doggett@mail.house.gov, Rep.Hinojosa@mail.house.gov, silvestre.reyes@mail.house.gov, tx18@lee.house.gov, texas17@mail.house.gov, martin.frost@mail.house.gov, ken.bentsen@mail.house.gov, ask.gene@mail.house.gov, rep.e.b.johnson@mail.house.gov, owen.pickett@mail.house.gov, rep.goode@mail.house.gov, jim.moran@mail.house.gov, ninthnet@mail.house.gov, Donna.Green@mail.house.gov, bernie@mail.house.gov, adam.smith@mail.house.gov, ron.kind@mail.house.gov, jerry4wi@mail.house.gov, telltom@mail.house.gov, jay.johnson@mail.house.gov, bobwise@mail.house.gov, nrahall@mail.house.gov,
John_McCain@McCain.senate.gov, senator@akaka.senate.gov, senator@biden.senate.gov, senator_bingaman@bingaman.senate.gov, senator@breaux.senate.gov, senator_byrd@byrd.senate.gov, senator_carnahan@carnahan.senate.gov, senator@clinton.senate.gov, senator@conrad.senate.gov, senator@dodd.senate.gov, senator@dorgan.senate.gov, dick@durbin.senate.gov, russell_feingold@feingold.senate.gov, senator@feinstein.senate.gov, bob_graham@graham.senate.gov, tom_harkin@harkin.senate.gov, vermont@jeffords.senate.gov, tim@johnson.senate.gov, senator@kennedy.senate.gov, john_kerry@kerry.senate.gov, senator_kohl@kohl.senate.gov, senator_leahy@leahy.senate.gov, senator@levin.senate.gov, blanche_lincoln@lincoln.senate.gov, senator@mikulski.senate.gov, senator_murray@murray.senate.gov, senator@billnelson.senate.gov, jack@reed.senate.gov, senator@rockefeller.senate.gov, senator@schumer.senate.gov, senator@stabenow.senate.gov, senator_torricelli@torricelli.senate.gov
Share

From a Colonel of the the US Air Force to the Judicial committee demanding immediate investigation of Obama’s forged and stolen IDs

Posted on | February 19, 2013 | 14 Comments
Richard Brewer
5:16 PM (2 minutes ago)

to Kathryn.Rexrode
Ms. Rexrode
Please pass this message to Chairman Goodlatte: Sir, I am a 26 year military veteran (retired) and not prone to rush judgments. I have looked at in detail the documentation  that Attorney Orly Taitz has accumulated regarding President Obama’s eligibility to serve in that office. I have watched with increasing alarm as those in our government and particularly our judiciary at various levels have chosen to ignore the evidence and instead attack the messenger or resort to technicalities to avoid doing their job. I am more concerned now about the future of our country than I have ever been. The media of course is so biased as to be not even worthy of listening to. Letters I have written to my representatives have resulted in just boilerplate replies none of which confront the issues. It is way past time to address this concern head-on and quit worrying that others will call us “birthers” or other stupid things. I prefer they call me a “truther” because that is what I am after. Only YOU can get to the truth. We 300+ million citizens rely on YOU 500+ government representatives (Exec, Congress, SC) to do what is right.
Please investigate at once the processes used by the administrators and the justices themselves to review this case (Noonan et al). What has apparently happened so far is frightening. We all took an oath to support and defend our constitution. Those who do not do so or who believe it is their job to ignore and change our constitution should do the honorable thing and immediately resign. As Gen MacArthur said ” a million ghosts” will rise up shouting “Duty Honor Country”.
You must look at every shred of evidence regarding President Obama’s SSN, his Selective Service Registration, his student status, and the other issues raised by Ms. Taitz (who has nothing to gain from this and has been subjected to cruel and vile ridicule) and the experts involved. I could care less what his grades were. My opinion is he should be proud to show his accomplishments at college as an example to all our children of what can be done if we work hard. But he seals his up so no one can see. Why? Time will eventually tell us but I do not believe we can wait long. The future of our children is at stake. The Supreme Court must be investigated now.
Thank you,
Richard Brewer, COL (Ret) USAF
San Antonio TX
Share
Posted on | February 20, 2013 | No Comments
Dr. Orly,
Great work with your SCOTUS attempt however we knew the outcome before you stared. After 100,000′s of emails, letters + petitions one might assume these tactics “Ain’t gonna work”.
Maybe it’s time for ‘Plan B’!!!
You are a true Patriot,
Harry Butler
Navy SEAL
Share

Please, send me this entry by Lyle Denniston and copy of the scotusblog. I need to know the position of Lyle Denniston and what exactly did the court mean by “Denied stay but did not act on any other aspect of the case”

Posted on | February 20, 2013 | 2 Comments
Javier
0 approved
It appears that the SCOTUS clerks may be up to their normal tricks of concealing what really happened during Tuesdays orders. At 9:50am (Tuesday;2/19/2013) a live scotusblog.com entry by Lyle Denniston stated — ‘In answer to a question, the Court denied a stay in the case of Noonan v. Bowen (12A606), but did not act on any other aspect of that case.’ — Several hours later the Supremecourt.gov docket showed ‘Application (12A606) denied by the court. It appears the docket ‘denied’ entry was intentionally entered in error or meant to be misleading, and that it is likely that more orders will come for case 12A606 on 2/10/2013. My bet is that we will have good news in this application. Truth can only be concealed for so long, and the momentum is surely running against this corrupt foreigner and his organization that has usurped the office of POTUS and occupied the people’s White House.
 
Share

Today, in one day over 2,000 people signed the petition to the US Congress to investigate Obama’s use of forged and stolen IDs, we have nearly 36,000 signatures and not one employee in the department of Justice, judge or Congressman, who stood up against high treason.

Posted on | February 20, 2013 | 10 Comments
Today, in one day over 2,000 people signed the petition to the US Congress to investigate Obama’s use of forged and stolen IDs, we have nearly 36,000 signatures and not one employee in the department of Justice,  judge or Congressman, who stood up against high treason.
What do we do next?
If such in your face most despicable act of treason can be committed, what do we have left?
I believe that if people do not protest and are not in the streets, in front of the faces of our corrupt Congressmen, Senators, US Attorneys, AGs and Judges, nothing will happen, this crime of the century will continue.
Please, call all of the talk shows. You have to be in the face of the treasonous and corrupt members of the media. Limbaugh, Hannity, Levine, O’Reilly are not much better than the liberal media. They all know the facts and they are all complicit. You can disrupt their programs in a way that they are not capable of talking about anything else, but the criminal in the WH. I am appalled by the fact that on the radio and TV these puppets are talking about any garbage, but not the crime of the century.  Call the shows under a  pretence of talking about something else. When you are on the air, suddenly address these media scoundrels and ask them “Michael Medved, please explain the audience, why are you committing treason and covering up the fact that Obama is using forged IDs and a stolen Social Security number?’. When  one after another listeners are sticking this in their faces and they can’t talk about anything else, the regime puppets will be forced to start talking about this crime of the century or get off the air.
You have to do it during meetings with every congressman, judge or any other governmental official.
Please, go to the office of your congressman or senator, particularly ones who claim to be conservatives and have someone take pictures or video of you with a sign “Marco Rubio, when will you stop committing treason and stop covering up Obama’s forged and stolen IDs?’ Republicans are as corrupt as Democrats.
You have to get in their faces.
Remember one basic fact: today this criminal enterprise is stealing the White House, tomorrow they will steal your house!!! the same corrupt and treasonous Department of Justice, judges, congressmen and senators will steal your house and everything you have. That is why they are pushing so hard to take away your guns. Either they will win or you will win. If you sit like a piece of furniture in front of your TV and do nothing, they will win. If you organize your friends, neighbors, relatives and start protests and get in their faces, you have a chance of winning!!!  there are 315 million of us and maybe 1,000 of them.
Share

A letter from the West Point graduate. Please, help me reach as many members of the U.S. military as possible. Please, help me organize meetings with members of the U.S. military, sheriffs department, national guard, oath keepers

Posted on | February 20, 2013 | 5 Comments

Reference for Dr. Orly Taitz 

 
Robert Hill
9:54 PM (3 hours ago)
 
to kathryn.rexrode, me, cyndee_hill
 
Dear Ms. Rexrode, I am a West Point graduate and spent 14 years in service to my Country to include combat in Vietnam.
Along with millions of other citizens, I have witnessed the complete breakdown of the rule of law regarding the eligibility of Barack Obama to be the President of the United States and about crimes that he has personally committed. He is the chief law enforcement officer in the Country and his Attorney General controls the FBI. Neither are about to investigate these issues. The Supreme Court is cowering in fear of something or refuses to get involved in something they may call “politics”. Since when are crimes called politics?
Dr. Orly Taitz, a true American hero, has tirelessly been shouting on the deaf ears of those who have sworn to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. Now, only the House of Representative can investigate and begin impeachment proceedings to remove a usurper from the highest office in the land.
Please, for the love of our Country, bring these issues to the attention of the members of the House Judiciary Committee. Do this by introducing Dr. Taitz to the Committee as she is the most knowledgeable on all these issues. She, a naturalized citizen from Russia, is the greatest patriot I have ever witnessed.
The most egregious crimes in the history of our great nation are being committed under our watch and we must do whatever is necessary to save our Constitution from all enemies, foreign and domestic.
Sincerely,
Robert J. Hill, III
USMA 1965
Share
Posted on | February 20, 2013 | 1 Comment
Sheryl Delgado
0 approved
You are a true American hero. Thank you for your hard work and devotion. I pray you are successful and safe.
 
Share

Open letter to the President of Israel seeking his reconsideration of a medal of Distinction to Obama in light of Obama’s use of forged and stolen IDs

Posted on | February 20, 2013 | 15 Comments
DR. ORLY TAITZ ESQ
29839 SANTA MARGARITA, STE 100
RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA, CA 92688
ORLY.TAITZ@GMAIL.COM
PH.949-683-5411 FAX 949-683-5483
ORLYTAITZESQ.COM

02.20.2013
Open letter to the President of Israel Shimon Peres
Office of the President
3 Hanassi St., 92188 Jerusalem
Tel: 972-2-6707211
Fax: 972-2-5610037
from Attorney Orly Taitz
Dear Mr. Peres,
I understand that recently you decided to reciprocate the Medal of Freedom that was given to you by Mr. Obama and give him a Presidential award of Distinction.
Please, see the attached briefs and documents that show that Mr. Obama is engaged in the most serious crimes of elections fraud and use of forged and stolen IDs for the purpose of the elections fraud.
Mr. Obama  is a citizen of Indonesia. He became a citizen of Indonesia when he resided there from 1969-1971 with his mother and step father, citizen of Indonesia Lolo Soetoro. Obama is not even his legal name. Attached passport of his mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, show his last name to be Soebarkah. He was born in Kenya, as evidenced by statements of the Minister of Kenya James Orengo, his own biography and the sworn affidavit from the assistant clerk of the Registrar of Hawaii. He is using a Connecticut Social Security number 042-68-4425, which was never assigned to him according to official governmental agencies E-Verify and SSNVS and was actually assigned to a Jewish Immigrant from Russia Harrison (Harry) J. Bounel (Mr. Bounel was a neighbor of your cousin Betty Persky, as he resided at 915 Daly Ave, Bronx, NY between 1935-1940)  and Obama/Soebarkah/Soetoro is using a computer generated forgeries claiming those to be valid copies of a genuine birth certificate and  Selective Service certificate. There are multiple legal actions in courts today seeking to remove him from office and prosecute him for elections fraud and use of forged IDs, as well as seeking to prosecute corrupt governmental officials, U.S. attorneys and Judges, who aided and abetted him. I now that you and your first cousin, Betty Persky, who under pseudonym Lauren Bacall became a famous and beloved U.S. actress, escaped from Poland and were spared the Holocaust. 65 million people around the world, among them 6 million Jews died due to actions of Adolf Hitler. Hitler’s reign of terror started in 1932  when corrupt German judges and corrupt members of Reichstag looked the other way and did not take a stand against the Constitutional violations of Hitler.  Not one single German judge found Hitler’s actions to be unconstitutional.
Today in the United States of America we reached the level of corruption and lawlessness which resembles Nazi Germany in the 1930s or Stalinist Soviet Union of 1917-1977 or Jihadist Iran today.  If World Community does not rise in helping the U.S. citizens in fighting this corruption and criminality in the U.S. Government, Congress and Judiciary, USA will become another NAZI Germany of 1940s.
You are planning to give Obama a medal of distinction. The question is: distinction in what? In criminality? In using all forged and stolen IDs? In fraud? In usurpation of the constitutional rights of the U.S. citizens?
You came from a family of well known Rabbis. Would they be proud of you giving a medal to a criminal? For 68 years you were married to your wife Sonia, who fought for justice during WW2 and beyond. Would she be proud of you giving a medal of distinction to a criminal?
Obama’s presence in the White House is the biggest embarrassment to this nation. You giving him a presidential award of Distinction will be the biggest embarrassment to the state of Israel.
Please, write to Mr. Obama and seeking verification of  the information provided in the attached pleadings before you give the aforementioned award and embarrass the state of Israel, before you give an award that will need to be taken back.
Sincerely,

Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ
Share

Notice of contempt by the Appellee, Comissioner of Social Security of the court order to file an answer and request for judgment for the Appellant was docketted in the District of Columbia

Posted on | February 20, 2013 | No Comments
United States Court of Appeals for District of Columbia Circuit
Court of Appeals Docket #: 11-5304 Docketed: 10/31/2011
Termed: 05/25/2012
Nature of Suit: 2895 Freedom of Information Act of 1974
Orly Taitz v. Michael Astrue
Appeal From: United States District Court for the District of Columbia
Fee Status: Fee Paid
Case Type Information:
1) Civil US
2) United States
3)
 
Originating Court Information:
District: 0090-1 : 1:11-cv-00402-RCL Lead: 1:11-cv-00402-RCL
Trial Judge: Royce C. Lamberth, U.S. District JudgeDate Filed: 02/16/2011Date Order/Judgment:Date NOA Filed:08/30/201110/25/2011

 

04/27/2012 Open Document MOTION filed [1371429] by Orly Taitz for default judgment. (Response to Motion served by mail due on 05/07/2012) [Service Date: 04/24/2012 by US Mail] Pages: 1-10. [11-5304]
05/25/2012 Open Document PER CURIAM ORDER filed [1375820] denying motion for default judgment [1371429-2]; denying motion for summary reversal [1364625-2]; granting motion for summary affirmance [1353593-2], withholding issuance of the mandate. Before Judges: Rogers, Griffith and Kavanaugh. [11-5304]
06/04/2012 Open Document PETITION filed [1377943] by Appellant Orly Taitz for rehearing en banc. [Service Date: 05/31/2012 by US Mail] Pages: 16-20. [11-5304]
06/20/2012 Open Restricted Document SUPPLEMENT [1380221] to petition for rehearing en banc [1377943-2] filed by Orly Taitz [Service Date: 06/18/2012] [11-5304]
07/30/2012 Open Document MOTION filed [1387271] by Orly Taitz to recall mandate (Response to Motion served by mail due on 08/09/2012) [Service Date: 07/26/2012 by US Mail] Pages: 1-10. [11-5304]
08/02/2012 Open Document CLERK’S ORDER filed [1387293] Upon consideration of appellant’s motion to recall the mandate, it is ORDERED that the motion be dismissed as moot. No mandate has issued in this case. A petition for rehearing en banc remains pending before the court. The mandate issued July 24, 2012, in No. 11-5306, Taitz v. Ruemmler, where no petition for rehearing was received by the court. [1387271-2] [11-5304]
08/09/2012 Open Document PER CURIAM ORDER, En Banc, filed [1388336] denying petition for rehearing en banc [1377943-2] Before Judges: Sentelle, Henderson, Rogers, Tatel, Garland, Brown, Griffith and Kavanaugh. [11-5304]
08/29/2012   MANDATE ISSUED to Clerk, District Court [11-5304]
01/29/2013 Open Document MOTION filed [STYLED AS "MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION DUE TO NEW EVIDENCE AND NEW DECISIONS"] [1417882] by Orly Taitz to recall mandate (Response to Motion served by mail due on 02/11/2013) [Service Date: 01/28/2013 by US Mail] Pages: 11-15 with attachments. [11-5304]
02/19/2013 Open Document MOTION filed [STYLED AS "MOTION FOR JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF THE APPELLANT"] [1421271] by Orly Taitz. (Response to Motion served by mail due on 03/04/2013) [Service Date: 02/18/2013 by US Mail] Pages: 1-10. [11-
Share
Posted on | February 20, 2013 | 2 Comments
Benjamin Francis Cooley commented on his video of you.
Benjamin wrote: “It’s not over Kathleen, not by a long shot. It just means peaceful redress has been exhausted. Now comes blood.”
Share

Do we have one single sheriff or police chief of any town or locality, who would effectuate an arrest of a foreign criminal who usurped the U.S. Presidency with forged and stolen IDs, who would arrest his accomplices in high places who commit high treason?

Posted on | February 20, 2013 | 10 Comments
James Smith
78 approved
Submitted on 2013/02/20 at 7:08 am
You can talk until you’re blue in the face. These freaks “sociopaths” mass Rico criminals have 100% infiltrated and conquered America. they’re direct emanate death threat enemies. Were never going to see America again unless we go fight this very second and arrest them right now. Now, it’s time, it’s our last chance to save lives and restore America, you better get up off our butts right now today and everyday until these infiltrators are out of harms way. And while you’re pondering, please remember a black boot stomping a human face in forever is what they want to do to peaceful American’s. They want us dead, does anyone get the plan yet? Or do us American’s just bow down and bend over and take it? I’m here to help any patriot Sheriff as a posse member and don’t care if I die trying to remove these punks because they must be removed right now.
 
Share

Allegations on saveamericafoundation.com were not proven. At this point it is only a suspicion of connections, there have to be investigations though of all of these deaths

Posted on | February 20, 2013 | 3 Comments
DonnaLS
10 approved
Submitted on 2013/02/20 at 7:48 am
- – – ‘speaking’ of deaths – -
http://www.saveamericafoundation.com/2012/04/07/obama-death-list-you-decide/
 
Share

Disturbing Pattern! Yet Another Military General Forced from Service

Posted on | February 20, 2013 | 1 Comment

Disturbing Pattern! Yet Another Military General Forced from Service

Read this article →
Disturbing Pattern! Yet Another Military General Forced from Service
Share
Posted on | February 20, 2013 | No Comments
August Jesse
11:07 AM (2 minutes ago)
 
to Kathryn.Rexrode
Attention Judiciary Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives
Attention Chairman Congressman Bob Goodlatte
c/o Committee staff member Kathryn Rexrode.
 
As an American Citizen and Combat Veteran I demand a immediate hearing on the issue of Barack Obama’s use of forged IDs and a CT SSN, which failed both E-Verify and SSNVS, as well as criminal complicity and cover up by high ranking officials of the U.S. Government, Social Security Administration and employees of a number of courts. Over 34,000 citizens signed this petition as can be seen on OrlyTaitzESQ.com. 34,000 U.S. citizens are demanding an
Share

from Windsor Marsh

Posted on | February 20, 2013 | No Comments
Dear Judiciary Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives c/o Committee staff member Kathryn Rexrode.
Please initiate immediate a hearing on the issue of Barack Obama’s use of forged IDs and a CT SSN, which failed both E-Verify and SSNVS, as well as criminal complicity and cover up by high ranking officials of the U.S. Government, Social Security Administration and employees of a number of courts.
Investigation to start with these:
1. Is Harry J. Bounel the President of the United States who filed his 2009 federal tax return using his lawfully issued Social Security #042-68-4425? AND, why is Barack H. Obama II aka Barry Soetoro using on his 2009 federal tax return a stolen Social Security #042-68-4425, that belongs to one of his wife’s relatives named Harrison J. Bounel whose date of birth was 1890?
2. Barack H. Obama II aka Barry Soetoro admitted in 1991 publication of his bio that he was born in Kenya and raised in Hawaii. Since then his grandmother provided his Kenyan birth certificate and stated she was present at his birth in Kenya; and Obama/Soetoro and Michelle Obama have stated that Kenya is the land of his birth; and Prior to Obama’s ensconcement to the White House, many international stories also stated that Obama was Kenyan-born as did members of Kenya’s legislative assembly who celebrated for the record about their Kenyan boy who rules the United States of America.
Furthermore, it has been reported that Obama administration has paid nearly $4 billion dollars for capital projects in Kenya since Obama usurpation of POTUS. Obama’s Hawaii birth certificate is an obvious fraud and a forgery, his Selective Service registration are destroyed by Obama’s EO, Obama’s SS# failed when checked through both E-Verify and the Social Security Number Verification Service.
3 Does this Judiciary Committee agree that anyone who obtained a federal government position of employment without verification of their identity should be immediately arrested and investigated as a possible domestic terrorist, and why are so many records destroyed or unavailable: Obama’s mother’s passport records before 1965 were destroyed; immigration records from August 1961, and Obama’s selective service application destroyed; and, Obama’s purported original birth certificate of Hawaii is non-existent and a forgery is presented —even Hawaii governor Abercrombie admitted he could not find Obama’s BC in Hawaii; Obama’s Social Security number is a stolen Connecticut SSN 042-68-4425 which was originally issued to Harrison J. Bounel who was born in 1890?
4. What passport did Obama/Soetoro use when you traveled to Pakistan in 1981?
5. Why did Obama sign the EO to extend Secrete Service protection for himself and W-Bush for Life instead of leaving it at 10-years? Protecting elite CRIMINALS ? !!
6……etc, etc 1000 at least more questions to investigate about the Fraud President Barack H. Obama II
And, Impeach his now. AND ARREST Obama NOW into custody of US Marshalls in solitary until trial

Please, fill out the SSA fraud reports and sent them to each and every administrative SSA judge around the country, SSA and local law enforcement

Posted on | February 20, 2013 | No Comments
Denise
14 approved
Submitted on 2013/02/20 at 5:30 am
Should we also fill out SS fraud reports? It would be nice if we all did. http://ssa-custhelp.ssa.gov/app/answers/detail/a_id/48/~/reporting-social-security-fraud
 

No comments:

Post a Comment