Gareth Porter - (Inter Press Service)
Translation: Abdul Rahman Al-Husseini
Provide
interviews conducted recently with the Minister of Aldvaaalasraúala;
Ehud Barak, proof that the new wave of reports received in
Asahafhalasraúalah about the possibility of an Israeli strike on Iran,
is a way hoped Prime Minister Beniamenentnaaho and his defense minister
from which to press the U.S. to get it to change Moagafhamn red lines
put it in front of Israel in relation to Iran's nuclear program. And
Tkdmmkablh gave her "a senior official in Jerusalem" to the network,
"Wi - Net News" recently, the first to explicitly link between option
unilateral Israeli, and the goal of securing approval Alrisbarak Obama
on the Israeli position the judge that there should be allowing Iran
that are available on the "capability" to produce nuclear weapons. In
the interview with "Wi - Net", stated Onalmsúl unnamed Showing express
package management: If "tightened management Obamamn position" in
relation to the Iranian nuclear program, Israel "may not Tstbadshn
attack unilaterally." Wrote Ron Ben-Yishai ; correspondent network, "Wi -
Net", that Alyobama "to repeat publicly (in front of the General
Assembly of the United Nations, for example) Onalolayat States will not
allow Iran to obtain nuclear weapons, and that Israel has the right
Fayaldvaa for itself, independently." Obama had made both statements,
from Alnahihalflah, at the conference held by the Israel Public Affairs
Committee (AIPAC), but he did not Akrarhamamundiz. But
the Israeli official added a condition much more difficult match to
drop the option of launching Alhjumalasraúala unilaterally on Iran,
according to Ben Yishai: Obama also made clear that the "Plan Red" is
no longer evidence of the intention to allow uranium up to levels
Drjhaloslhh, but also on the Red Line Israel, which means must not allow
Iran to Baltuaraly enrichment capacity to do so, in the event made
this decision. In the context of this transformation Alradriqalevi "red line"
will be considered by the Netanyahu government to those public
statements demanded by the official as "a real commitment by the United
States to act, militarily if necessary," according to Ben-Yishai. He
said Ben-Yishai: "as much as evaluating the senior Israeli official
that Halqublt Washington demands major Israeli, Israel would reconsider
its measures Ahadahganb, and will be coordinated with the United
States." Che interview that what is sought Alehuntnaaho and Barak is the
position of Manalbr.s. Iranian nuclear, and that Israel can be
exploited to increase domestic pressure to Alyobama maximum range to
attack Iran in the event of his re-election. The attention Alasraúelevi pressure by threatening military option unilaterally to change the general attitude of the
towards Iran, has suggested in an interview Ncherthasahifah Haaretz on
the tenth of August, with official described the journalist who
conducted the interview, Ari Shavit, a "decision maker." Has been described senior official, who did not Ivkrasmh, way left little doubt that, in fact, Ehud Barak.
And
linking the official, who was not named explicitly effort
Ntnaahollabaka the unilateral option on the table, with the need to
influence policy does not e. He
said: "If you missed Asraúilfrsh act, and it became clear that it is no
longer available on the force to act, the likelihood Altsrvsikl turn."
As alluded also to debate within the Israeli government - is supposed
Onhaijeri between Netanyahu and Barak in themselves - about what to
expect from management Obama on Iran. official said: "Accordingly, we
can not wait years to see who is who Kanaly right ... the person who
said that the possibility of disposal of high, or the person who said
that the possibility of Altsrfmnkhvd." that refer to different
assessments of behavior on the part of management Obama, Chirely that
Ehud Barak was probably argue that the threat of a unilateral Israeli
attack could Onestkhaddm pressure as a means to transform the
advertising policy to one free from the threat of direct attack Iran. The
person Barakaamoma Obama administration's policy as being more intense
on Iran, compared with a diagnosis of Netanyahu Alveacefha terms Mzdria.
In
the context of the modern "gap authentic and structural" between the
"red lines" of various Israeli, said a senior official: "Fayalazahr, can
the say Bsaolhgesr this gap., And they can clearly say that with the
solutions the following spring, it will be Dyalaaranyen nuclear program,
and they Sedmrunh." But he pointed out that such a threat Albesatalas
realistic. The
Israeli official said "Those who do not offer a version of this
Albeanabusat, because the countries do not make these types of data to
each other." He
added: "The president can not abide the decision will be taken at
present or that it will not be taken after Sthshahur from now." This includes reference to that someone else was insisting on a commitment of this kind Obamamn. May
represent the terms of the transaction identified as such in the
interview with "Wi - Net", the position furthest from the direct, and
that Barak was hoped to be a likely more realistic., But there is no
reason to think that Obama, who refuses to pressure from his own
administration to Tgierkhth Red in the direction of the position is in
favor of Israel, would accept this deal. The
evidence demonstrates Mnhatin interviews that Israel is passionate
about, that were not so eager to reach a deal with the Department of
Obamahol Iran. However,
the new wave of reports which appeared in the Israeli press
Fayalosbuaan first of August for a unilateral Israeli option, meaning
you can not Okhzhaovq virtual. The
newspaper reported the New York Times on 12 August, that bout Msaurhmn
newspaper articles and television reports on the weekend, indicated that
Ntnaahokab corner of the decision to attack Iran unilaterally this
fall. "But Netanyahu and Barak are still Abdian vigilance to distinguish
between the study of choice Aldharbhalaskarah from one side, and a
commitment to its implementation. "There may be a central goal lies
Raaltaqarir recent press - and Netanyahu's campaign - Barack largest
that had begun at a time Sabgahma year - is to make the idea of a strike
unilateral Israeli nuclear sites Alaaranihtqubl ratification, despite
all evidence to the contrary.
On
10 August, for example, reported Channel Althanihfa Israeli television,
Netanyahu and Barak have said in talks recently that there was a "slim
chance relatively" to lead an attack on Iran to "the outbreak of war
Akulaimahwasah band, under the circumstances that resulted in the Middle
East in the weeks or months Kulailhalmadih. " The
report said that "the assumption current" is that although the party
Allahouhmas will provide the answer, "the assessment is that Syria will
not provide the answer." Anhalist Syria nor Hezbollah were the ones who
Ikleghan Israeli military officials and Msúlyalastkhbarat, but Iran over
what will be. When
challenged journalist Haaretz "decision-maker" Israeli mentioning the
serious repercussions of the potential for the outbreak of war with
Iran, in light of the presence of Miatalsoarich Iranian capable of
hitting Israeli cities, argued the official said: "What distinguished
the Iranians always, is the fact that they envisage caution and
patience." And Atdmanaltrah, which aims to make the attack threatened by
the sounds reasonable, an apparent contradiction: on the one hand, show
Iran great care in response to the Israeli attack, but it is reasonable
Aljhhalokhry Iran's failure to go around the arms nuclear, despite the
risks involved in it. as Barak also put in an interview with the
newspaper "Haaretz" that can Asraúaltagel Iran's nuclear program eight
or ten years - saying it is a time Kavialon happen regime change in
Iran. And
continues to senior Israeli military officials, like Israeli
intelligence officials also believe that the attack on Arencadmn - not
even in the transition will be quick to go about Iran possessing nuclear
weapons instead Mnaaaqth. In
fact, Barak had said on 17 September of the year 2009: "I am not among
those who believe that Iran poses an existential threat to Israel." On
November 17 (November) of the year 2011, denied in an interview with
"Charlie Rose "even be Iran's nuclear program aims to Israel from the
ground up. And
involve argument Barakhol Iran Contrary to the assertions of Netanyahu
which was mentioned recently in a report for the second channel, which
is broadcast on 5 August, in which he said that the supreme spiritual
leader of Iran is the "commander of the irrational". * Historian,
investigative journalist who specializes in security policy national. He had received an award for Galhorn Albraitanihsahafah articles written about the war in Afghanistan.
No comments:
Post a Comment