Agreement western - Iranian, mutual break and liver in Israel!

Agreement western - Iranian, mutual break and liver in Israel!

D. Adel Mohammed Ayesh al-Astal

Despite Israeli efforts waged by the Israeli Prime Minister, "Benjamin Netanyahu" around the world, and through all available means, to try to understand all, Israeli concerns better, and that there is a need to prevent Iran from acquiring the ability to achieve a breakthrough strategic security, and to persuade that the Iranian regime is ideologically and religiously committed to the destruction of Israel and scanned from the world map. And in order to prevent the occurrence of any agreement with Iran over its nuclear program, but all of them, without exception, failed, and had feared "Netanyahu" has occurred, and became a visible reality. And is now also refers to reports, in the case of rare Igmaúah, did not reach the degree of severity, where even in the darkest political and security crises earlier. The only consolation in front of him, that the agreement is an agreement (Progress) for only six months, and that there is plenty of time to turn things down as it deems appropriate, at a minimum try again to collect the world against Iran through incitement and phishing attitudes in this regard, and in a maximum of asylum eventually to implement in the head by embarking on the implementation of a military scenarios that have long embarked upon his foundation of military exercises since the term, in order to implicate the total and indefinite. Especially since it warned from the outset that Israel offers to military action on its own, and is about to issue an order that, since the belief that pressure from Washington to Tehran has dropped to alarming levels, and European steps against Iran began to recede.

Agreement that has been reached, is an action plan, as announced European relations commissioner, "Catherine Ashton," and, as described by the U.S. President "Barack Obama" that represents an important first step, and at the same time to the continued existence of enormous difficulties will appear later. Which are contributed to the increase nervousness and tension with "Netanyahu" because it is through a similar experience, when it announced a freeze on settlement activity in the Palestinian territories ten months in late 2009, while he in fact did not stop for a moment.

In view of the agreement and it certainly stands on two readings do yield different - at least - adequate space for the various demons in order to play its role assigned to it anyway.

While the reported American milieus that the agreement - progress - provides for the freezing of stocks Iranian (nuclear fuel) enriched by 20% "and carry out inspections rigorous Iran's nuclear facilities, that will stop the progress of its nuclear program, and does not recognize at the same time Iran's right to enrichment process . terms of confirmed U.S. Secretary of State, "John Kerry," that this step does not provide for Iran's right to enrichment, whatever the explanations that have been given. and that Iran is committed to stop expanding its Altakosaibi and not pursuing the development of a reactor (Arak) or plutonium program related to this, On the other hand - as he says - the agreement will make the world safer, and the rest of our partners in the region., but Iran announced its part about it is that has made ​​significant gains, especially on the adoption of the West, particularly the United States right to full enrichment on its territory. while The Minister of Foreign Affairs of Iran "Mohammad Javad Zarif," that the agreement includes a clear signal that the enrichment will continue. not to mention the other benefits that may outweigh the Western package of incentives offered to Iran since 2007, in the case of reaching an agreement on its nuclear program.

All the talk coming from the United States on calming Israel, both leading up to the agreement or that followed, were not present any significant achievements of the self-Israeli in general, despite the contacts a U.S. official and presidential intensively with Israel, and in particular with "Netanyahu" on studying the details of the agreement The emphasis on the protection of the U.S. position hard Israel, and the pledge by "Obama" on himself to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. But there were Israeli reactions less described as crazy and hasty, made ​​clear in a lot of the positions of the Israeli leaders and officials of political and military alike, most notably of the head of state, "Shimon Peres," who would have preferred a diplomatic solution to any other solutions, where announced that this agreement is not successful, and that the alternatives would be far worse, which means the possibility of an Israeli military attack. As issued by the Office "Netanyahu" has been described agreement victory historic Iranian diplomacy, being achieved through all its conditions, as granted to continue enriching uranium, which will allow her to continue with its nuclear program and access to a nuclear weapon, especially that this agreement does not include the dismantling of nuclear reactors to Iran. He announced, "Netanyahu that" Israel is not bound by this agreement, and will not allow Iran to develop its nuclear capabilities. He promised that Israel would defend itself. In turn, hastened Israeli Finance Minister "Yair Lapid" to attack the agreement, saying it serves the interests of Iran, describing the agreement as bad. For his part, rejected the defense minister, "Moshe Yaalon," the deal and considered it an important achievement for Iran, which is struggling to gain time to reach a nuclear power, and then the threat of and access to the gains. As well as the Minister of Housing, "Uri Ariel," attacked the Convention, and considered that Iran today has become a nuclear state with the approval of an international, and that Israel has to defend its existence and its interests alone and do not wait for anyone to defend it. Also the former head of the Mossad, "Meir Dagan," expressed regret, and declared that Israel did not get what they want.

Although this agreement is still in the test it and it seems both over the evolution of nuclear activities of Iran in the past few years and the extent of adherence to it, or on the urgency of the Western countries to achieve or over Israeli responses that reject him, it is unlikely to achieve Ohdva and the centrality of value, where a failed similar agreement failed in 2009, and private sectors on reducing Iran's stockpile of low-enriched uranium to below the amount needed to build a bomb if enriched to a higher degree.

But, in spite of all that, it has the right of each of the parties involved in it, claiming victory and the achievement of its objectives, as the United States considers as a diplomatic victory - historically - to manage it, towards a chance to finish the most complex files that have faced in decades missed, without resorting to military solutions , has raced the parties involved (5 +1) to describe the agreement as good. For its part, considered Iran's agreement accomplishment is important, which does not meet the demands of the Iranian nuclear issue, but also it is - most importantly - that the agreement will allow it to enter strongly in the family of the international community, as a present to deliver an undiminished, and at the expense of various Western powers including the United States.

Younis / Palestine
11/24/2013