Japan’s government, threatened with more HAARP attacks, pays 60 trillion yen to Feds
UPDATE, 11 April 2011: Dark Cabal make good of its threat, delivered a 7.1 tremor possibly from a hijacked Japanese oil drilling ship…
Posted by benjamin , April 5, 2011
Posted by benjamin , April 5, 2011
The cowardly Japanese Prime Minister
Naoto Kan handed 60 trillion yen over to the Federal Reserve Board
crime syndicate immediately after his country was attacked with HAARP
and nuclear terror, according to Japanese security police sources. The
extortion money was paid off following threats to use HAARP to cause
Mt. Fuji to erupt. For those of you still too brainwashed to believe
such a thing is possible, please take a look at the following
transcript available on the US Defense Department’s home page:
http://www.defense.gov/Transcripts/Transcript.aspx?TranscriptID=674It quotes then Secretary of Defense William Cohen as publicly stating in 1997 that:
“Others
are engaging even in an eco-type of terrorism whereby they can alter
the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of
electromagnetic waves.”
The chief suspects in the Earthquake,
Tsunami and Nuclear terror attacks against Japan are US Senator J.
Rockefeller and the Bush Nazi faction of the US corporate and criminal
government.
Rockefeller is a power broker behind GE,
the company that manufactured the flawed reactors now spewing radiation
in Fukushima. In addition, US Deputy Secretary of State Kurt Campbell,
acting as an envoy for Rockefeller, met with Japanese power broker
Ichiro Ozawa on March 9th, two days before the earthquake, tsunami and
nuclear disaster hit Japan. During that meeting Campbell promised that
if Ozawa cancelled his plans to split the ruling Democratic Party of
Japan, Japanese public prosecutors would stop persecuting him,
according to Japanese imperial family and Democratic Party sources.
Ozawa was also promised control of zeolite deposits in Fukushima
Prefecture, the sources said. Zeolite is used to clean up radioactive
waste. It is also worth noting that Senator Rockefeller once wrote an
introduction to a book by Ozawa.
In another sign this was a deliberate
attack, experts at the University of Tokyo and well as in Italy
detected HAARP signals focused on Fukushima in the hours before the
earthquake and tsunami struck. The same signals have since been
detected focused on Mt. Fuji where the ground water is heating up. In
addition, over 5 different people have contacted this writer since the
earthquake to warn that “Japan was about to sink into the ocean.”
To counteract this threat, the White
Dragon Society has provided GPS coordinates for all worldwide HAARP
facilities to the appropriate parties. We have also been contacted by
agents located within US underground bases who told us the US Seal
Beach underground base (with a HAARP facility in it) had seven levels
with one entrance located 14,000 feet underground and another located
26,080 feet underground. There were also entrances to underground bases
in Brekon Beacon in Wales, Brussels in Belgium and Berkshire, England.
Despite the cowardly reaction of the
Japanese government, the Federal Reserve Board crime syndicate and
their corporate subsidiary known as Washington D.C. are still headed
for bankruptcy. This is a fact of nature that cannot be changed with
threats and violence, no matter how extreme.
Fortunately, US President Obama and four
top Generals have promised to take action against the Satanist
Khazarians operating inside the US in exchange for a write off of all
US external debt. The debt will, of course, be written off, but only in
exchange for a promise of a swords-to-plowshares transition by the
military industrial complex.
In a separate development, we published a
warning last week from a self-described MI6, FSB and Serbian triple
agent using the code name Alexander that the Camp Bondsteel US military
base in Kosovo would be hit by a suitcase nuclear bomb at 4:44 PM on
April 4th. We waited to see if this would happen before writing this
report and it did not.
As a result, we feel a need to explain
why we took Alexander’s warning seriously. “Alexander” first contacted
this writer several years ago after being introduced by a Canadian
agent called Steve M. He told me he had 70 kilograms of Thai Stick,
that is to say marijuana dipped in opium and said that he would kill me
if I did not introduce him to the yakuza. I introduced him to a
Japanese right-winger who then took him to see some Yakuza gangsters.
The yakuza told him it was a trap and that the “Thai stick” was tainted
with dangerous narcotic chemicals.
In fact, Alexander became increasingly
delusional and megalomanic (calling himself the Anti-Christ etc.) after
partaking of his own product. Alexander himself is a nice person who
means well but he was sent here by some very nasty people connected to
George Bush senior et al.
This trap was part of what appears to be a
deliberate campaign to discredit this writer. A Japanese public
security agent also, around the same period, attempted to get this
writer to drink orange juice that had been spiked with amphetamines.
There were other such incidents as well that I will not get into.
These attempts to destroy this writers’
mind with drugs were accompanied by a massive smear campaign.
Democratic Party of Japan politicians, Japanese publishers and many
other influential people have been approached multiple times by people
saying “Benjamin Fulford has gone insane.”
Unfortunately for them, my sanity is still here with me (I can see it floating right above my head J).
There is nothing insane about saying that
90% of humanity’s savings should not be spent on a massive military
machine engaged in perpetual warfare. It is the current rulers of the
West who are acting insanely by invading harmless countries, killing
innocent people and stealing their resources.
All the White Dragon society and its
allies are saying is that we want the owners of the Federal Reserve
Board to appear before a truth and reconciliation committee in exchange
for forgiveness and that control of the global financial system be
returned to the people of the planet. We have the ability to end
poverty and stop environmental destruction within a matter of months.
|
|||
|
|
|
||
|
||
|
|
||
DoD News Briefing: Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen
Cohen’s keynote address at the Conference on Terrorism, Weapons of
Mass Destruction, and U.S. Strategy at the Georgia Center, Mahler
Auditorium, University of Georgia, Athens, Ga. The event is part of the
Sam Nunn Policy Forum being hosted by the University of Georgia.
Secretary Cohen is joined by Sen. Sam Nunn and Sen. Richard G.
Lugar.]Secretary Cohen: Senator Nunn, thank you very much. As Senator
Nunn has indicated, he and I have worked for many years together, along
with Senator Lugar. The two of these gentlemen I feel are perhaps the
most courageous and visionary to have served in the Senate. They were
largely responsible, of course, for adopting the so-called Nunn/Lugar
legislation.
I’ll comment on that later during the
course of the morning, but I’ve had occasion to meet with a number of
Russian counterparts, and as we go through various translations of the
communications that we’re having, the two words they are able to
articulate very clearly, they say ‘Nunn/Lugar, Nunn/Lugar. So they know
exactly what that means, and that means the Cooperative Thre’at
Reduction Act that these two gentlemen were indispensable in
shepherding through the United States Congress.
It was Nunn/Lugar I that dealt with the
reduction of nuclear weapons between the United States and the Soviet
Union in terms of trying to come to grips with how we helped the
Russians dismantle hundreds of their nuclear weapons, and also helped
them with their destruction of chemical weapons. But they, of course,
have looked beyond simply that particular relationship, which is very
important, but also looking to the future that we face as far as the
rise of terrorism — both international and domestic; and finding ways
in which the Department of Defense can become involved in helping local
states and local agencies to deal with the threat of terrorism which
is quite likely to increase in the coming years.
It’s a pleasure for me to be here. Both
Senator Nunn and Senator Lugar are close friends and I look forward to,
I think, a very productive seminar. Once again demonstrating that
although Senator Nunn has left public service in the Senate, he has not
left public service as far as the nation is concerned.
It’s a pleasure for me to be here, Sam.
Senator Nunn: Thank you very much, Bill.
. ..Let me ask if there are any questions for Secretary of Defense Cohen.
Q: The dual containment policy in Iran
and Iraq, do you think that’s conducive to regional stability in that
region? And do you think can cause further terrorism in the United
States? That type of containment policy in the Middle East.
A: I think Secretary Albright articulated
our policy as far as dealing with Iraq, that it’s clear that we have
been unable to strike any kind of a productive relationship with Saddam
Hussein, and as soon as Saddam Hussein is no longer the head of that
government, that there’s new regime that follows him, that we will look
forward to finding ways in which we could engage them in a much more
productive fashion, particularly after they comply with all of the UN
sanctions. There’s an eagerness on our part to do that. But I think as
long as he remains in office as the head of that state, it’s unlikely
that we could have anything but the current policy in place, with very
little prospects for relief.
With respect to Iran, I think Iran
continues to present a long term threat to the region. They are
acquiring and have acquired weapons of mass destruction, substantial
levels of chemicals and we believe biological weapons as well. They
have made an effort to acquire nuclear capability. So I think that our
policy of dual containment is the right one, and we are going to
encourage our allies to support that one.
Q: What does it mean that Clinton (inaudible) proliferation?
A: To the extent that we see the level of
communication available today, the Internet and other types of
interwoven communicative skills and abilities, we’re going to see
information continue to spread as to how these weapons can be, in fact,
manufactured in a home-grown laboratory, as such. So it’s a serious
problem as far as living in the information age that people who are
acquiring this kind of information will not act responsibly, but rather
act in a terrorist type of fashion.
We’ve seen by way of example of the World
Trade Center the international aspects of international terrorism
coming to our home territory. We’ve also seen domestic terrorism with
the Oklahoma bombing. So it’s a real threat that’s here today. It’s
likely to intensify in the years to come as more and more groups have
access to this kind of information and the ability to produce them.
Q: How prepared is the U.S. Government to deal with (inaudible)?
A: I think we have to really intensify
our efforts. That’s the reason for the Nunn/Lugar II program. That’s
the reason why it’s a local responsibility, as such, but the Department
of Defense is going to be taking the lead as far as supervising the
interagency working groups, and to make the assessments as to what
needs to be done. So we’re going to identify those 120 cities and work
with them very closely to make sure that they can prepare themselves
for what is likely to be a threat well into the future.
Q: Let me ask you specifically about last
week’s scare here in Washington, and what we might have learned from
how prepared we are to deal with that (inaudible), at B’nai Brith.
A: Well, it points out the nature of the
threat. It turned out to be a false threat under the circumstances. But
as we’ve learned in the intelligence community, we had something
called — and we have James Woolsey here to perhaps even address this
question about phantom moles. The mere fear that there is a mole within
an agency can set off a chain reaction and a hunt for that particular
mole which can paralyze the agency for weeks and months and years even,
in a search. The same thing is true about just the false scare of a
threat of using some kind of a chemical weapon or a biological one.
There are some reports, for example, that some countries have been
trying to construct something like an Ebola Virus, and that would be a
very dangerous phenomenon, to say the least. Alvin Toeffler has written
about this in terms of some scientists in their laboratories trying to
devise certain types of pathogens that would be ethnic specific
so that they could just eliminate certain ethnic groups and races; and
others are designing some sort of engineering, some sort of insects that can destroy specific crops. Others are engaging even in an eco- type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves.
So there are plenty of ingenious minds
out there that are at work finding ways in which they can wreak terror
upon other nations. It’s real, and that’s the reason why we have to intensify our efforts, and that’s why this is so important.
Q: What is response to (inaudible)?
A: We hope we will have access to the
defector. In fact I was recently in South Korea and talked with various
officials in South Korea. As soon as they complete their own
interrogation of this defector, we will have access to that individual.
But much of what he has said to date is reflected in the writings that
he prepared last year. This is prior to his defection. One would not
expect a potential defector to be writing about anything other than
what the official doctrine or dogma is of the North Korean government
at that time. He is saying essentially what we have known for a long,
long time. Namely, that North Korea poses a very serious threat against
South Korea, and potentially even Japan, by virtue of having the
fourth largest army in the world, by having 600,000 or more troops
poised within 100 kilometers of Seoul, of possessing many SCUD
missiles, also the potential of chemically armed warheads, the attempt
to acquire nuclear weapons. So we know they have this potential, and
the question really is going to be what’s in their hearts and minds at
this point? Do they intend to try to launch such an attack in the
immediate, foreseeable future? That we can only speculate about, but
that’s the reason why we are so well prepared to defend against such an
attack to deter it; and to send a message that it would be absolutely
an act of suicide for the North Koreans to launch an attack. They could
do great damage in the short run, but they would be devastated in
response. So we’re hoping we can find ways to bring them to the
bargaining table — the Party of Four Talks — and see if we can’t put
them on a path toward peace instead of threatening any kind of
devastating attack upon the South.
Q: . ..a little bit about the situation in (inaudible)?
A: I really don’t have much more
information than has been in the press at this point. The Department
has not been called upon to act in this regard just yet, so I’m not at
liberty to give you any more information than you already have.
Q: . ..the Administration’s plans to
expand NATO to more European countries. Is there a terrorism element?
Or will expanding NATO help you in any way in terms of (inaudible)? Or
is it really unrelated?
A: I think the two are unrelated. There
is a legitimate debate that will take place in terms of the pace of
enlargement or whether there should be enlargement. Secretary Albright
and I testified last week before the Senate Armed Services Committee,
and it was a very, I think, productive debate. It’s something that
Senator Nunn, I think, feels very strongly about as well. The two of
us, I think, found ourselves on the Senate Floor last year saying it
was time for the American people to start debating this issue. So it’s
very important and there will be legitimate differences of opinion, but
it’s important that we bring this to the Senate for full debate and
disclosure, and bring it to the American people. But I doubt if it’s
related to the spread of terrorism whatsoever.
Senator Nunn: Thank you very much.
No comments:
Post a Comment