IT IS TIME WE ALL LEAVE FACE BOOK
WHEN ISLAM HAS THE RIGHTS TO TALK ABOUT HOW THEY WANT TO KILL ME AND RAPE MY
HOW THEY WANT TO RAPE AND KILL MY SON OR DAUGHTER
IT IS TIME WE THE PEOPLE QUIT FACEBOOK
IT IS TIME FOR LAW SUITS I AM IN A CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT RIGHT NOW WITH FACEBOOK GOOPGLE AND VERIZION
Facebook: Page advocating the beheading of infidels does not violate rules
Facebook says page advocating the beheading of infidels does not violate terms of service.
Credits:
Peter Foley/Bloomberg via Getty Images
Despite Facebook's rules prohibiting violent content, a page that openly advocates beheading anyone who disrespects the prophet Mohammed does not violate the site's terms of service, Facebook spokesman Fred Wolens told Examiner on Wednesday.
The page, "Behead Those Who Disrespect Our Prophet P.B.U.H," does not violate the rules, Wolens said, because Facebook has "different standards around images versus text."
"Under our terms, this Page does not credibly threaten a specific person or target a protected category," he explained in an email.
Robert Spencer of Jihad Watch wrote about the page Tuesday, calling it "real hatred and incitement to violence."
"It is not 'hate' when it's a Facebook page. It only becomes 'hate' when I report about it," he wrote.
At least two readers at Jihad Watch said they reported the page to Facebook and were told it did not violate their terms of service.
It's not the first time Facebook has ruled in favor of such content.
In April, the social media giant said a gruesome video of a woman being decapitated did not violate their rules against graphic violence.
Wolens justified the ruling by claiming that people were posting it in order to condemn it.
The news of Wednesday's ruling did not sit well with Diane Sori, a conservative blogger who was banned from Facebook over a link to a beheading picture she never posted. The link was posted by an administrator of the pro-Sarah Palin page "Barracuda Brigade for Our American Girl! 2012."
Sori, along with other administrators of the page, was punished due to Facebook's policies that hold all administrators responsible for content regardless of the circumstances.
Sori told Examiner by private message that by allowing the page to remain, "along with all the anti-Israel, anti-Jewish, anti-Christian, anti-Jesus, and anti-conservative pages (including pages that call for the deaths of Sarah Palin and Mitt Romney)," the site was demonstrating its loyalty to Obama and, she added, "his far left, anti-American, pro-Islamic agenda."
Sori also said those who invest in Facebook stock need to know about the situation.
For some time, conservatives have bitterly complained about what they see as a double standard in Facebook's policy enforcement.
As a result, several conservative Facebook-like alternatives have come into existence. Tea Party Community, for example, has attracted over 125,000 users. Other sites include United Patriots and Online Friends.
A Facebook event also asks users to stay off the social media site on Independence Day, July 4.
Examiner's Chris Collins has more on the background of the page here.
Related:
If you like this article, you can follow Joe on Twitter @jnewby1956, subscribe to receive email updates when a new article is published, or check out his Facebook page.
The page, "Behead Those Who Disrespect Our Prophet P.B.U.H," does not violate the rules, Wolens said, because Facebook has "different standards around images versus text."
"Under our terms, this Page does not credibly threaten a specific person or target a protected category," he explained in an email.
Robert Spencer of Jihad Watch wrote about the page Tuesday, calling it "real hatred and incitement to violence."
"It is not 'hate' when it's a Facebook page. It only becomes 'hate' when I report about it," he wrote.
At least two readers at Jihad Watch said they reported the page to Facebook and were told it did not violate their terms of service.
It's not the first time Facebook has ruled in favor of such content.
In April, the social media giant said a gruesome video of a woman being decapitated did not violate their rules against graphic violence.
Wolens justified the ruling by claiming that people were posting it in order to condemn it.
The news of Wednesday's ruling did not sit well with Diane Sori, a conservative blogger who was banned from Facebook over a link to a beheading picture she never posted. The link was posted by an administrator of the pro-Sarah Palin page "Barracuda Brigade for Our American Girl! 2012."
Sori, along with other administrators of the page, was punished due to Facebook's policies that hold all administrators responsible for content regardless of the circumstances.
Sori told Examiner by private message that by allowing the page to remain, "along with all the anti-Israel, anti-Jewish, anti-Christian, anti-Jesus, and anti-conservative pages (including pages that call for the deaths of Sarah Palin and Mitt Romney)," the site was demonstrating its loyalty to Obama and, she added, "his far left, anti-American, pro-Islamic agenda."
Sori also said those who invest in Facebook stock need to know about the situation.
For some time, conservatives have bitterly complained about what they see as a double standard in Facebook's policy enforcement.
As a result, several conservative Facebook-like alternatives have come into existence. Tea Party Community, for example, has attracted over 125,000 users. Other sites include United Patriots and Online Friends.
A Facebook event also asks users to stay off the social media site on Independence Day, July 4.
Examiner's Chris Collins has more on the background of the page here.
Related:
- Facebook: Beheading video 'doesn't violate' standards for graphic violence
- Facebook justifies decision to not pull grisly beheading video
- This July 4th, celebrate Freedom from Facebook Day
- Facebook yanks gun sellers’ pages over firearm sweepstakes
- Conservative bloggers say Facebook selectively enforcing non-existent rules
- Liberals on Twitter celebrate death of Margaret Thatcher
- Facebook bans conservative blogger for link she did not post
- Facebook targets conservative page for closure, backtracks and apologizes
- White House yanks petition asking for action on Facebook censorship
- Is Facebook actively censoring conservative bloggers?
- Do Facebook policies banning users squelch free speech?
- Facebook page calling for death of Sarah Palin gets more violent
If you like this article, you can follow Joe on Twitter @jnewby1956, subscribe to receive email updates when a new article is published, or check out his Facebook page.
No comments:
Post a Comment