Obama CIA Director Called Benghazi Talking Points “Useless” – Then He Was Forced To Resign

by Ulsterman on May 12, 2013 with 4 Comments in News

Most who have been following the now exploding Benghazi Massacre scandal that is justifiably pummeling the Obama administration, likely recall former CIA Director David Petraeus’s sudden departure following an admission he had carried on an affair with his biographer.  Today we have learned that the details of that scandal were not released until AFTER Petraeus voiced opposition to the now discredited Obama White House false talking points surrounding the Benghazi attack.  Coincidence?  Yeah, right…

(New evidence proves former Obama CIA Director disagreed with the false Obama administration Benghazi Massacre “talking points”.  A little over a month later, David Petraeus was forced to resign from the CIA after details of an affair were leaked to a media source.)

______________________________________
(via Hot Air)

ABC: Petraeus called final Benghazi talking points “useless” the day before Rice’s full Ginsburg

One of the mysteries in the Benghazi scandal has been the role of David Petraeus, who was then the Director of the CIA but was forced to resign in a personal scandal shortly thereafter.  While the White House and State Department tried to cobble together talking points to explain away the terrorist attack that took four American lives, what did Petraeus do?  According to new information reported for the first time by Jonathan Karl on ABC News’ This Week earlier this morning, Petraeus rejected the final version as “useless” — and then threw the issue to the White House.

Read more in News

« FREE THE OBAMA BENGHAZI SCANDAL PRISONER NOW

We already knew that Petraeus was stunned by the revisions; now we know he rejected them personally.  ”I would just as soon not use them, but it’s their [the White House] call.”  That would contradict the meme over the last few days that this was an intramural fight between State and CIA with the White House just serving as bystanders.  The CIA Director called the “demonstration” talking points useless the day before Susan Rice went on five Sunday talk shows, but the White House apparently disagreed.  They, evidently, found the false narrative very useful.
…Maybe a select committee should hear more from David Petraeus.  How did his deputy end up approving talking points he himself would have rejected? Who in the White House decided to run with them anyway?   LINK
_____________________________________
KEEP UP THE PRESSURE AMERICA.
DON’T ALLOW YOURSELF TO BE DISTRACTED.
THIS BENGHAZI SCANDAL IS THE REAL DEAL.
WATCH FOR CIA WHISTLEBLOWERS TO BE ANNOUNCED SOON.
__________________________________
“The answers to the current trends of America, and the inevitable result of Obamacare, are revealed in this exciting new novel by DW Ulsterman. The characters come alive and the action is right there in your chair. The political and the economic, are joined and discussed without long rants or philosophical treatises, in a clear and concise manner.”    -OLD WEB DOG  LINK