|
Written by Adam Taylor
|
| Wednesday, 27 March 2013 19:20 |
Editor’s note: This is Part 9 (see Part 8)
of an extensive report by 9/11 researcher Adam Taylor that exposes the
fallacies and flaws in the arguments made by the editors of Popular
Mechanics (PM) in the latest edition of Debunking 9/11 Myths. We
encourage you to submit your own reviews
of the book at Amazon.com and other places where it is sold. For more
information on the topics discussed in this section, see our FAQ on Larry Silverstein and our article that analyzes Barry Jennings’ testimony. (Quotes from Popular Mechanics’ book are shown in red and with page numbers.)
Part 9:
Larry Silverstein and Barry Jennings
Larry Silverstein’s “Pull It” Quote
 Analysis
of Larry Silverstein’s statements about WTC7 reveals that they do not
match the sequence of events that occurred on 9/11 |
PM’s next section deals with another controversial issue in the
debate regarding WTC7 – the infamous quote from WTC7 owner Larry
Silverstein regarding the building’s destruction. For reference, here is
Silverstein’s full quote from his interview with PBS:
“I remember getting a call from the, er,
fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were
gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, “We’ve had such terrible
loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.” And they made
that decision to pull, and we watched the building collapse.”1
|
|
Read more...
|
|
| Friday, 15 March 2013 17:14 |
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth
Proudly Announces:
THIS IS THE YEAR WE MAKE IT HAPPEN!
In spite of the fact that the 9/11 truth message has
been censored by many in the media, ignored by Congress and the
President, and shunned by most academic institutions, polls still show
that more than 30% of US citizens doubt the official story about 9/11.
Let’s reach out to the rest!
The terrifying specter of drone strikes on US civilians, the Patriot Act, the Military Commissions Act, and the National Defense Authorization Act… these are just a few disturbing consequences that continue to follow widespread acceptance of the official 9/11 narrative.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
Written by Chris Sarns, Richard Gage, AIA, and Gregg Roberts
|
| Wednesday, 13 March 2013 18:45 |
No. The NIST WTC 7 computer animation of the collapse does not even
remotely resemble the observations and actual video footage of the
destruction in three main ways. A scientifically valid explanation of
any phenomenon must account for the key observations. Moreover, a computer simulation does not constitute an explanation. It is merely a tool for determining and visualizing what might have happened if various assumptions are true.
NIST has refused to disclose the computer inputs of its mathematical models. This makes it impossible for anyone to check their work.
1. While NIST admits publicly that the building descended at
“free-fall” acceleration, its computer simulation is not consistent with
a building that is coming down in free fall.
NIST’s Final Report on the collapse of WTC 7 (NCSTAR 1A, p. 45)
states that gravitational acceleration (free-fall) of the main roofline
occurred. It began when the point NIST was using [1] as its
marker on the video had descended about 7 feet*. In Figure 12-62 (NCSTAR
1-9 Vol.2 p. 588) the roofline has descended about 10m /33 feet (NCSTAR
1-9A, p. 77) and the columns are still buckling in an irregular manner.
Buckling columns provide resistance and would obviously prevent the
building from collapsing at free-fall acceleration. The NIST computer
model is clearly not simulating free-fall acceleration. |
|
Read more...
|
|
Written by Mike Bondi
|
| Wednesday, 13 March 2013 17:42 |
Editor’s Note:
This article chronicles the ongoing
efforts by Canadian 9/11 Truth activists to persuade their members of
Parliament to call for a new 9/11 investigation. If you’d like to take
part in this crucial campaign, send an email to Mike Bondi and tell him you want to help!
 Vancouver East MP Libby Davies became the first federal representative to call for a new 9/11 inquiry in the Canadian Parliament |
Canadian AE911Truth supporters are making the best of a unique
opportunity that their government provides for obtaining a real 9/11
investigation. The petition process grants all Canadians the right to
petition Parliament – but as we discovered, this can be an uphill
battle.
The general principle is that any Canadian may
petition Parliament directly in a matter that cannot be resolved any
other way. The first step is to create the petition and have it
certified to be “in order” by the Clerk of Petitions. Once this is done,
at least 25 signatures must be gathered.
Parliamentary rules
do not allow unelected citizens to be on the floor of Parliament. A
Member of Parliament (MP) needs to agree to physically deliver a
particular petition to the clerk’s desk inside Parliament. |
|
Read more...
|
|
Written by AE911Truth Staff
|
| Tuesday, 12 March 2013 16:47 |
Recent and Upcoming Events Bring AE911Truth to San Francisco, Las Vegas and Atlanta
AE911Truth has important events
planned for just about every month in 2013. If you feel the need of an
AE911Truth presence to “light a fire” in your city, just let us know. Your support will enable us to visit your area and inform your community about the explosive 9/11 evidence.
RECENT EVENTS…
January 11, 2013: St Mary’s College – Moraga, CA
 AE911Truth rang some bells in this sleepy St. Mary’s campus with the help of a no-holds-barred activist professor |
Professor Albert Dragstedt, from the Classics department of St.
Mary’s College, asks us each year to teach a 2½-hour class in the
special January session course that he has created called “9/11
Studies”. It’s all about what really happened on 9/11, which is quite
illuminating to the students, most of whom are caught unaware. Many
guest speakers have provided their insight, including William Veale, the
attorney for April Gallop; Mickey Huff of Project Censored; James
Hoffman of 911Research.com; and Paul Rea, author of “Mounting Evidence”.
It is also refreshing to have a course in today’s colleges whose
required reading includes David Ray Griffin’s “Pearl Harbor Revisited”! |
|
Read more...
|
|
Written by Dick Scar, BSAE
|
| Saturday, 09 March 2013 15:26 |
 The 95-minute Experts Speak Out DVD in paper sleeves is now available in bulk at rock-bottom prices |
Our blockbuster DVD, 9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out, is now available in paper sleeves from the AE911Truth online store at bulk prices as low as $1.50 each!
AE911Truth has produced and distributed many DVDs since its founding, but none have had more impact than Experts Speak Out. After the Final Edition was released in May 2012, Director Richard Gage, AIA, and other 9/11 experts presented nationwide screenings of the video during a 32-city world premiere tour.
Experts Speak Out made its broadcast TV premiere on Colorado Public TV in September, 2012. It soon soared to become the #1 watched and shared film on PBS.org, even beating out the popular drama, Downtown Abbey. The video has received more than one million views
on PBS.org, and there are currently at least a dozen other PBS stations
interested in airing it this year. Others are likely to join the list,
due to the active outreach efforts by AE911Truth supporters. |
|
Read more...
|
|
Written by Wayne Coste, P.E., with contributing editor Eli Rika
|
| Friday, 08 March 2013 18:02 |
Will Amy Goodman Break the 9/11 Media Silence?
 Is Amy Goodman part of the “silent majority” when it comes to questioning the official 9/11 story? |
For a journalist, when something cannot be said, the silence is the most important story. Many people believe that Amy Goodman, host of the popular public radio and TV show Democracy Now!,
is among the best when it comes to confronting people in power and
asking hard questions. She may be one of the best, but her silence about
9/11 is stunning. For example, she has yet to tell her audience or her
readers that nearly 2,000 architects and engineers – all verified and vetted – are calling for a new investigation of the destruction of the three
World Trade Center skyscrapers on 9/11, citing evidence of controlled
demolition. That should be headline news for a journalist whose
self-described role is to report on alternative voices excluded by the
mainstream media. |
|
Read more...
|
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment