|
Stanley Ann Dunham
Passport File
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| This page contains an embedded
Scribd.com page . . . |
|
Now, All We Need Is Obama's
|
|
|
| Inconsistencies Found In Passport
Applications |
Sharon Rondeau says the U.S. State Department has
released 14 pages of documentation in response to a Freedom of
Information Act request for documents made by Mr. Christopher Strunk
dating back to October 2008.
Strunk was originally directed to
make his request to the Bureau of Customs and Border Control, which is
part of the Department of Homeland Security. He did so and stated
that the records he had requested "do not fall within any of FOIA
exemptions items" (page 7).
He also claimed that "The above
requested documents are extremely critical and important to Petitioner
as well as the general public and are of substantial public interest"
(page 8).
Strunk stated that Obama was born in "Mombasa, Kenya"
and, citing the 1940 Nationality Act followed by the 1952 Nationality
Act, claimed that his mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, "did not meet the
citizenship requirements to register Barry Soetoro’s birth as "natural
born…" (page 11).
He further contended that Obama, aka Barry
Soetoro, was registered as an Indonesian citizen to attend the
Fransiskus Assisi School in Jakarta, and that "The Indonesian school,
upon registration of a new student, verified the citizenship status and
name of the child with the Indonesian Government; moreover, Indonesian
Immigration and police checked all public schools on a weekly basis to
ensure the only students attending were in fact Indonesian citizens"
(page 12).
The original response letter to Strunk from the State
Department is as follows:
Click here -- lots of screen snapshots . . .
There's a lot of stuff here, and
again these artifacts create more questions than they answer. |
| This Guy Thinks Obama's Indonesian Too |
Christopher Strunk, who in November 2008
requested copies of Obama’s mother’s passport file from the State
Department under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), finally received
a response which includes 12 pages of documents. Although they
provide some information about the dates of some of Stanley Ann Dunham’s
travels, the file includes no documents dated earlier than 1965 -- which
might indicate whether Dunham traveled to Kenya in mid-1961. The
State Department’s excuse for releasing no older documents is: "Many
passport applications and other non-vital records from that period were
destroyed during the 1980s in accordance with guidance from the General
Services Administration. (That claim would seem by many to be
absurd. First, the federal government rarely discards any records.
More importantly, on the assumption that passport documents are filed
alphabetically by name rather than by document date, it seems unlikely
that tens of thousands of man-hours would have been spent going through
the passport files of every American in order to extract and destroy
only the oldest documents.) [13328, 13329, 13330]
Some Stanley
Ann Dunham passport file documents are released. Passport office
implies in cover letter earliest passport application no longer exists.
The earliest 1960/1961 passport application paper work information
is missing from this released information. The record starts with
a "RENEWAL" application filed in 1965 due to her name change after
marrying Lolo Soetoro at Molokai Hawaii on March 15, 1965 per page
marked P3 of the released documents.
The carefully worded cover
letter implies earlier years records have been purged for some reason.
Since passport records are filed in files by name and not in boxes or
files by year, this does not make sense. It sounds to me like HI
officials (or whoever controls them) are now instructing the U.S.
Passport Office how to obfuscate and parse sentences in cover letters to
allow them to not provide what one asks for and yet not be lying.
There was obviously a passport issued to Stanley Ann (whatever name
she used to get it) prior to 1965. Passports in the 1960’s or so
were good for 3 years and could be renewed for an additional 2 years.
There is block in the passport to show it had been renewed (or not).
Those passports had an issue date in them but no expiration date but an
Aviso below it:
In the passport it says (with an arrow pointing
to it) IMPORTANT Unless Otherwise Limited -- This Passport Expires Three
Years From Issue Date -- If Renewed, It Expires Five Years From Issue
Date.
One Dunham
passport document shows that she married Indonesian Lolo Soetoro on
March 15, 1965, while another shows a marriage date of March 5, 1964 --
15 days before her March 20, 1964 divorce from Barack Hussein Obama, Sr.
Other documents show that in mid-1967, in preparation for her move to
Indonesia, Dunham completed an application to amend her existing
passport to reflect her married name, Stanley Ann Soetoro. Yet
that request was to amend a passport issued on July 19, 1965 under the
name Dunham. It would have been illogical for a married woman to
apply for a passport in 1965 using her maiden name, only to have to
amend it later. This suggests that her first passport was issued
in 1960 or 1961 and then simply renewed in 1965. But because the
"official Obama story" never has Dunham leaving the United States until
she moved to Jakarta with second husband Lolo Soetoro, it is reasonable
to ask why Dunham even had a passport before 1965 that required renewal.
The likely answer is that her first passport was obtained to travel to
Kenya in mid-1961 -- and the State Department could not release those
documents without making that obvious. If Obama was legally
adopted by Lolo Soetoro he became an Indonesian citizen. If the
adoption took place before his 6th birthday (on or before August 4,
1967), Obama would be considered an Indonesian citizen retroactive to
his birth under the Hague Convention.
...But as everything with
this family, nothing is consistent. In 1965 she (Stanley Ann) says
she married Lolo Soetoro on March 15, 1965 in Molokai Hawaii. But
in a later passport renewal application marked P5 filed in 1981 she
states she married him on March 5, 1964 in Maui, Hawaii. Which is
true? Either way, said marriage dates, could have allowed for
Obama to have been legally adopted by Lolo Soetoro in Hawaii at age 5 or
under given these marriage dates, and his falsified birth records in
Hawaii, fraudulently created by grandma Dunham in 1961, and which could
have been amended to show the new legal name of Barry Soetoro. And then
Obama could have later re-amended them back to put his name back to
Barack Hussein Obama II when in his life that suited him. Obama is a
life narrative chameleon. He changes names and citizenship at will
during his life to suit his current needs and plans.
Also on
document P2, the second page of that document, she wrote in the block
named "Amend to Include (Exclude) Children" the name of her son Barack
Hussein Obama and then right below it a weird name or phrase spelled and
in parenthesis as (Soebarkah). This entry then has 5 diagonal line
strike-through lines across the entry. Another mysterious new
tidbit to research.
Stanley Ann Dunham's Passport File
Related: CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret) has
a few comments on Mario Apuzzo's blog.
Related: Inconsistencies found in passport applications
released by State Department for Obama’s alleged mother.
You haven't heard the end of this
document drop. There's a lot of explicit info here, and a lot that
can be implied. We now know that the Dunham/Soetoro marriage was
in 1964 or 1965, not 1967, as the "official" narrative tells us.
This is why it's so important to get Obama's original documents -- ALL
of them. |
| Who Gave Guidance To Destroy Passport
Records? |
Sharon Rondeau
says that last July, Mr.
Christopher
Earl Strunk’s Freedom of Information request
for the passport records of Stanley Ann Dunham Obama Soetoro was
granted in part by the
State Department, accompanied by a cover letter from Mr. Jonathan M.
Rolbin which provided the following
explanation for the missing records:
"Many passport applications and other non-vital
records from that period were destroyed during the 1980s in accordance
with guidance from the General Services Administration."
The Post & Email
contacted the General
Services Administration and requested documentation of such "guidance"
allegedly provided from the GSA for the destruction of passport records.
However, in her reply to us, GSA employee Ms. Sharon Lighton stated:
Authorization and the destruction of Federal
records is the responsibility of NARA. The Department’s Records
Management Program is responsible for ensuring that the legal,
financial, evidentiary and historical transactions are recorded
accurately and completely. Therefore, you would need to contact
NARA at the address provided.
In an objection to Mr. Rolbin’s contention that
the records in question had been "destroyed," Mr. Strunk filed a
brief in the U.S.
District Court for the District of Columbia which maintained that no
such directive had ever been made.
The Post & Email took Ms. Lighton’s advice and
wrote to Mr. Olin at the NARA on September 18, 2010. Now, s ix weeks have passed, and no response has been
received from the NARA in
violation
of the Freedom of Information Act’s 20-working-day response requirement.
It appears that strict
regulations for
altering records retention rules are maintained, and any changes must
pass through an approval process. There are explicit
provisions which
allow for microfilms to suffice for the original documents; however,
permission for the destruction of government records must be obtained
from the
Archivist following
a written
request.
Blogger
Butterdezillion has compiled a list of "dispositions" for the
State Department which
do not encompass
the early 1960s.
Why has the NARA failed to respond to our request?
Why is Mr. Rolbin’s assertion to Christopher Strunk
unable to be verified?
What is it about Stanley Ann Soetoro’s passport
records that the federal government does not want the public to see?
Where was she during the early 1960s? If
she had been in the United States, she would most likely not even have
possessed a passport, as she was allegedly a young college student
attending either
the University of Hawaii or University of Washington. Yet Mr.
Rolbin seemed to say in his letter that Stanley Ann had filled out a
passport application, as he explains its absence from the information
released to Strunk in an indirect way.
Is there anyone who traveled abroad in the early 1960s
who has requested his or her passport documentation from that time
period and told that it had been ordered "destroyed?"
Who is lying, and who is telling the truth?
|
| Comments . . . |
|
|
| |
©
Copyright Beckwith 2010
All right reserved
|
No comments:
Post a Comment