Press release: Commissioner of Social Security defaulted in 2 Circuits, Obama is in default in CA

Posted on | February 18, 2013 | 3 Comments

Press Release
Law offices of Orly Taitz
Commissioner of Social Security administration previously defaulted in RICO (Racketeering case) related to him covering up Obama’s use of a stlen CT Social security number, which was never assigned to him according o E-Verify and SSNVS.
Now he defaulted in yet another circuit: US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Notice of Default and motion for the default judgment was filed in DC.
Obama is currently in default in the US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Judges of these courts have to finally issue a default judgment and order production of all the original documents as part of the post judgment discovery. It is time to put an end to this national nightmare and national disgrace. It is time to end the most egregious case of the elections fraud, forgery and treason.

Case Search Calendar Opinions Orders/Judgments Briefs XML TXT

Logout Help

Court of Appeals Docket #: 11-5304	Docketed: 10/31/2011 Termed: 05/25/2012
Nature of Suit: 2895 Freedom of Information Act of 1974
Orly Taitz v. Michael Astrue
Appeal From:  United States District Court for the District of Columbia
Fee Status:  Fee Paid

Case Type Information:

1) Civil US

2) United States

3)

Originating Court Information:
District: 0090-1 : 1:11-cv-00402-RCL				Lead: 1:11-cv-00402-RCL
Trial Judge: Royce C. Lamberth, U.S. District Judge     Date Filed: 02/16/2011     Date Order/Judgment:     Date NOA Filed:     08/30/2011     10/25/2011

03/16/2012 RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION FILED [1364625] to motion for summary affirmance [1353593-2](Reply to Response by Mail and Response to Cross Motion due on 03/29/2012) combined with a MOTION FILED [STYLED AS "MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF THE APPELLANT"] by Orly Taitz for summary reversal [Service Date: 03/15/2012 by US Mail] Pages: 1-10. [11-5304] 04/27/2012 MOTION filed [1371429] by Orly Taitz for default judgment. (Response to Motion served by mail due on 05/07/2012) [Service Date: 04/24/2012 by US Mail] Pages: 1-10. [11-5304] 05/25/2012 PER CURIAM ORDER filed [1375820] denying motion for default judgment [1371429-2]; denying motion for summary reversal [1364625-2]; granting motion for summary affirmance [1353593-2], withholding issuance of the mandate. Before Judges: Rogers, Griffith and Kavanaugh. [11-5304] 06/04/2012 PETITION filed [1377943] by Appellant Orly Taitz  for rehearing en banc. [Service Date: 05/31/2012 by US Mail] Pages: 16-20. [11-5304] 06/20/2012 SUPPLEMENT [1380221] to petition for rehearing en banc [1377943-2] filed by Orly Taitz [Service Date: 06/18/2012] [11-5304] 07/30/2012 MOTION filed [1387271] by Orly Taitz to recall mandate (Response to Motion served by mail due on 08/09/2012) [Service Date: 07/26/2012 by US Mail] Pages: 1-10. [11-5304] 08/02/2012 CLERK’S ORDER filed [1387293] Upon consideration of appellant’s motion to recall the mandate, it is ORDERED that the motion be dismissed as moot.  No mandate has issued in this case.  A petition for rehearing en banc remains pending before the court.  The mandate issued July 24, 2012, in No. 11-5306, Taitz v. Ruemmler, where no petition for rehearing was received by the court.  [1387271-2] [11-5304] 08/09/2012 PER CURIAM ORDER, En Banc, filed [1388336] denying petition for rehearing en banc [1377943-2] Before Judges: Sentelle, Henderson, Rogers, Tatel, Garland, Brown, Griffith and Kavanaugh. [11-5304] 08/29/2012 MANDATE ISSUED to Clerk, District Court [11-5304] 01/29/2013 MOTION filed [STYLED AS "MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION DUE TO NEW EVIDENCE AND NEW DECISIONS"] [1417882] by Orly Taitz to recall mandate (Response to Motion served by mail due on 02/11/2013) [Service Date: 01/28/2013 by US Mail] Pages: 11-15 with attachments. [11-5304]

IN THE US COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

TAITZ

V

ASTRUE

COURT OF APPEALS NUMBER 11-5304

US DISTRICT COURT NUMBER 11-CV-00402-RCL

NOTICE OF DEFAULT/ FAILURE TO RESPOND BY THE APPELLEE

MOTION FOR JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF THE APPELLANT

Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ
29839 Santa Margarita, ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
Phone 949-683-5411 fax 949-766-7603















Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ, Appellant herein filed a motion for reconsideration/ motion to recall the mandate due to new evidence and new precedents by this court. This court ordered the Appellee, Commissioner of Social Security Administration  to respond by February 11, 2013. As of today, February 18.2013 Appellee did not comply with the court order and failed to respond to the motion. As such Appellant notifies this court the Appellee is in contempt of the court order and in default and therefore the Appellant is respectfully moving this court to grant the Appellants motion for reconsideration /to recall the mandate.

Respectfully submitted

/s/ Orly Taitz, ESQ
Certificate of service
I, Lila Dubert, am over 18 years old, not a party to this case. I attest that I served the Appellee with the attached Notice of Default / Motion for Default Judgment   through his Attorney , Helen Gilbert, Deputy U.S. Attorney by first class mail and/or ECF
555 4th Street, NW
Washington, DC
(202) 252-1900