Dr. Taitz, Esq. has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles. Press release: state defendants are withdrawing their motion to dismiss the complaint in Grinols v electoral college Posted on | February 21, 2013 | No Comments George Waters 8:52 AM (1 hour ago) to me, Edward Ms. Taitz, On behalf of the state defendants, no stipulation to dismiss will be necessary. Later today I will file a notice of withdrawal as to the state defendants’ motion to dismiss scheduled for March 7, 2013. You should know that I anticipate filing a motion to dismiss directed to the amended complaint. George Waters Deputy Attorney General California Department of Justice 1300 I Street, Suite 125 PO Box 944255 Sacramento, CA 94244-2550 916/323-8050 george.waters@doj.ca.gov From: Orly Taitz [mailto:orly.taitz@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 4:40 PM To: George Waters; Olsen, Edward (USACAE) Cc: Orly Taitz Subject: motion to deny motions to dismiss as moot and to vacate the hearing Dear Mr. Olsen and Mr. Waters, – As you know, I filed the first amended complaint, which makes the motion to dismiss the original complaint moot. I am asking you to stipulate to withdraw the motion to dismiss the original complaint and vacate the hearing scheduled for 03.21.2013 If you refuse to stipulate, I will be filing a motion to vacate the hearing and deny the motions to dismiss as moot and will be seeking the fees. In the interest of the Judicial economy and ethical considerations I believe you should stipulate and avoid an unnecessary hearing Sincerely Dr Orly TaitzESQ 29839 Santa Margarita pkwy, ste 100 Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688 ph 949-683-5411 fax949-766-7603 orlytaitzesq.com

Dr. Taitz, Esq. has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.

Press release: state defendants are withdrawing their motion to dismiss the complaint in Grinols v electoral college

Posted on | February 21, 2013 | No Comments

George Waters	8:52 AM (1 hour ago)
to me, Edward

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ms. Taitz,

On behalf of the state defendants, no stipulation to dismiss will be necessary. Later today I will file a notice of withdrawal as to the state defendants’ motion to dismiss scheduled for March 7, 2013.

You should know that I anticipate filing a motion to dismiss directed to the amended complaint.

George Waters
Deputy Attorney General
California Department of Justice
1300 I Street, Suite 125
PO Box 944255
Sacramento, CA 94244-2550
916/323-8050
george.waters@doj.ca.gov



From: Orly Taitz [mailto:orly.taitz@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 4:40 PM
To: George Waters; Olsen, Edward (USACAE)
Cc: Orly Taitz
Subject: motion to deny motions to dismiss as moot and to vacate the hearing

Dear Mr. Olsen and Mr. Waters,

– As you know, I filed the first amended complaint, which makes the motion to dismiss the original complaint moot. I am asking you to stipulate to withdraw the motion to dismiss the original complaint and vacate the hearing scheduled for 03.21.2013

If you refuse to stipulate, I will be filing a motion to vacate the hearing and deny the motions to dismiss as moot and will be seeking the fees.

In the interest of the Judicial economy and ethical considerations I believe you should stipulate and avoid an unnecessary hearing

Sincerely

Dr Orly TaitzESQ

29839 Santa Margarita pkwy, ste 100

Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688

ph 949-683-5411 fax949-766-7603

orlytaitzesq.com