http://asafm.army.mil/Documents/OtherDocuments/CongInfo/BLDL/PL//98AUTHpl.pdf
Public Law 105–85 105th Congress An Act - Office of the ASA
File Format: PDF/Adobe AcrobatPUBLIC LAW 105–85—NOV. 18, 1997. Public Law 105–85. 105th Congress. An Act. To authorize appropriations for fiscal year 1998 for military activities of the ...
(2) Send a link to this page to everyone you know.
To send
either of the above links in an email, just right-click on the link and
select either “Copy Shortcut” or “Copy Link Location”. Then paste it
directly into the body of your email message by right-clicking in the
body and then clicking “Paste”.
___________________________________
U.S. Law Allows Testing of Chemicals and Biological Agents on “Civilian Population”
PUBLIC LAW 105-85- NOV. 18, 1997: USE OF HUMAN SUBJECTS FOR TESTING OF CHEMICAL OR BIOLOGICAL AGENTSSEC. 1078. RESTRICTIONS ON THE USE OF HUMAN SUBJECTS FOR TESTING OF CHEMICAL OR BIOLOGICAL AGENTS.(a) PROHIBITED ACTIVITIES. – The Secretary of Defense may not conduct (directly or by contract)(1) any test or experiment involving the use of a chemical agent or biological agent on a civilian population; or
(2) any other testing of a chemical agent or biological agent on human subjects.(b) EXCEPTIONS.- Subject to subsections (c), (d), and (e), the prohibition in subsection (a) does not apply to a test or experiment carried out for any of the following purposes:(1) Any peaceful purpose that is related to a medical, therapeutic, pharmaceutical, agricultural, industrial, or research activity.
(2) Any purpose that is directly related to protection against toxic chemicals or biological weapons and agents.
(3) Any law enforcement purpose, including any purpose related to riot control.
(2) any other testing of a chemical agent or biological agent on human subjects.(b) EXCEPTIONS.- Subject to subsections (c), (d), and (e), the prohibition in subsection (a) does not apply to a test or experiment carried out for any of the following purposes:(1) Any peaceful purpose that is related to a medical, therapeutic, pharmaceutical, agricultural, industrial, or research activity.
(2) Any purpose that is directly related to protection against toxic chemicals or biological weapons and agents.
(3) Any law enforcement purpose, including any purpose related to riot control.
.
So section (a) prohibits these cruel and inhumane chemical and biological tests on humans.
Then section
(b) says that the prohibitions in section (a) do not apply to tests
carried out for virtually any purpose. So section (b) completely negates
the prohibitions of section (a).
In Other Words: The U.S. government can test chemicals and biological agents on humans for nearly any purpose they desire.
The Following Should Also Be Noted
The term “biological agent” as stated above in (a)(1) is defined in (e) as follows:
The term “biological agent” as stated above in (a)(1) is defined in (e) as follows:
(e) BIOLOGICAL AGENT DEFINED.- In this section, the term “biological agent” means any micro-organism (including bacteria, viruses, fungi, rickettsiac, or protozoa), pathogen, or infectious substance, and any naturally occurring, bioengineered, or synthesized component of any such micro-organism, pathogen, or infectious substance, whatever its origin or method of production, that is capable of causing -
(1) death, disease, or other biological malfunction in a human, an animal, a plant, or another living organism;
(2) deterioration of food, water, equipment, supplies, or materials of any kind; or
(3) deleterious alteration of the environment.
(1) death, disease, or other biological malfunction in a human, an animal, a plant, or another living organism;
(2) deterioration of food, water, equipment, supplies, or materials of any kind; or
(3) deleterious alteration of the environment.
.
In Other Words: The
U.S. government can test chemicals and biological agents on humans that
cause death, biological malfunction, and deleterious alteration of the
environment. The term “deleterious alteration of the environment” brings
chemtrails to mind.
Human chemical testing programs currently in operation: Here
Full text of Public Law 105-85 here. Excerpt from page 287
Informed Consent: Some argue that none of this activity can be conducted without “informed consent”, as stated in section (c), which reads:
(c)
INFORMED CONSENT REQUIRED. – The Secretary of Defense may conduct a
test or experiment described in subsection (b) only if informed consent
to the testing was obtained from each human subject in advance of the
testing on that subject.
.
Although
section (c) seems to provide some protection for us in that it requires
us to be notified “in advance” if this “testing” is to take place, in
reality, it does not provide any protection at all.
Why not?: Because you’ve already been “informed in advance” and you’ve already given your “consent”.
Because this
“law” is publicly available for everyone to read, you have been
“informed”. Because you have not contested it (that’s what the courts
are for), you have provided your “consent”.
This law is
part of a contract between you and the government. When the terms of a
contract are known and uncontested, it’s called “acquiescence”.
Acquiescence essentially means that both parties are in agreement.
Acquiesce: “submit or comply silently or without protest”
So, when
this law was published, you were “informed”. Because you have not
challenged it in court, you have “consented”. By your own inaction, you
have said, “Sure, go ahead and poison me, even if it causes death. I
have no problem with it.”
Because this contract meets the judicial requirements of “remedy” and “recourse”, it is legally binding.
Judges like
to say: “Ignorance of the law is no excuse”. They say this because you
are expected to know all of the “law” because it is publicly available
for you to read (despite the fact that this is humanly impossible).
So, in
reality, section (c) is legally useless. It does not provide any
additional protection, it only “seems” to. Section (c)’s only purpose
for being included in this law is deception, nothing more.
Deception: Section
(c) of this “law” is very deceptive because most people don’t
understand the concepts of acquiescence in contract law, therefore,
people mistakenly conclude that this “testing” will never happen to them
unless they are informed about it.
The
powers-that-be play upon public ignorance by inducing people into having
a false sense of security. As a result, the public believes this
activity could not be occurring because they believe that they would
have personally heard about it. This false belief then provides
insurance that this law will never be contested in court, and as long as
this law remains uncontested, chemtrail spraying will continue
unhindered.
The final
result is that this craftily-written law has done its job. It has
enabled chemtrail spraying to continue without being contested in court.
Additionally, this law continually provides legal protection for those
doing the spraying. After all, by your inaction you have given them your
permission.
When you
consider the incredibly dark nature of this deception and when you
consider the fact that this law gives your public servants the
self-appointed power to kill you, you should then consider what kind of
people are running your country, or the world for that matter.
Supplement: This Public Law in The US Code: Title 50, 1520aThis May Also Interest You
Historical Examples of Biological Testing On Americans
This interesting documentary details some of the history of military testing against Americans.
Chemical Testing on U.K. Citizens: Zinc Cadmium Sulfide (video)
Another shocking video revealing military chemical testing programs on citizens.
The Smoking Tooth Video (video)
Watch mercury vapor coming off a “silver” dental fillings. The CDC says: “Estimates of the amount of mercury released from dental amalgams range from 3 to 17 micrograms per day (μg/day). The mercury from dental amalgam may contribute from 0 to more than 75% of your total daily mercury exposure,…” Centers for Disease Control, Toxicological Profile for mercury, CAS# 7439-97-6, March 1999
Biological Warfare On the American People, Dr. Garth Nicolson (video)
Morgellons, fibromyalgia, Gulf War Syndrome: Are these all artificial diseases caused by military experimentation on living humans? This is a must-see video.
Dr. Hildegarde Staninger Interview On Morgellons Disease (video)
Dr. Staninger exposes the evidence linking chemtrails to Morgellons disease. Currently, over 1000 new people contract Morgellons in the U.S. each day. The highest rates of new cases are currently found in California, Texas, and Florida.
Does the Bible Talk About Chemtrails?
The Bible makes several references to the method used by the powerful global merchants (bankers/traders) of the Earth. It reveals what method they will use to deceive all of the people of the Earth.
No comments:
Post a Comment